| Question for Admin/Mods - Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 Next |
| View previous topic
:: View next topic |
Gregor
 Posted:
Sun Jul 13, 2008 12:57 pm |
|
|
|
Re: Question for Admin/Mods
| toodles wrote: | I'm confused as to the new rules and dont want banned or timed out. I'm not the only one struggling to understand so I'd like to ask.
Are we allowed to call Beth/Joran a lying sack of shit?
I see some of my posts calling Natalee 'Nat' which is what I call her have been edited..is this a no no? I'm confused as I see some edited and some not.
Are descriptive terms to degrade Joran or Beth allowed? Or is just not calling them by their names? Please Help. TIA |
If you comport yourself on this board as you would if you were having tea with the Bishop I'm sure you'll stay out of trouble.
|
|
Joined: 23 Mar 2006
Posts: 1851
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
| SavannahStar
Posted:
Sun Jul 13, 2008 1:00 pm |
|
|
|
Re: Question for Admin/Mods
| Gregor wrote: |
If you comport yourself on this board as you would if you were having tea with the Bishop I'm sure you'll stay out of trouble. |
|
|
**SuperStar**
Joined: 24 Mar 2006
Posts: 21295
Location: Midnight in the Garden of Good and Evil
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| resigned
Posted:
Sun Jul 13, 2008 1:00 pm |
|
|
|
Re: Question for Admin/Mods
| Gregor wrote: |
If you comport yourself on this board as you would if you were having tea with the Bishop I'm sure you'll stay out of trouble. |
Sounds like another rule...what thread was that on?
|
|
Click your heels together...
Joined: 14 Aug 2006
Posts: 28583
Location: "Onboard" pathenry's desk
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| constantpeace
Posted:
Sun Jul 13, 2008 1:20 pm |
|
|
|
Re: Question for Admin/Mods
| resigned wrote: |
Sounds like another rule...what thread was that on? |
I think that falls under the rule of common sense - but of course, I'm probably wrong 
|
|
Joined: 23 Mar 2006
Posts: 258
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Alvin
Posted:
Sun Jul 13, 2008 1:27 pm |
|
|
|
| SavannahStar wrote: |  |
My 8 month old German Shepherd eats Pit-Bulls. 
|
|
** Banned **
Joined: 24 Mar 2006
Posts: 1196
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Katie
Posted:
Sun Jul 13, 2008 1:29 pm |
|
|
|
| lin wrote: |
Exactly, toodles. And trying to use a sincere question to a mod to attack other posters and then blame you for their attacks as if your question was baiting is just plain sad. Especially after YIF ok'd it and after VC said stop it that they continue is very interesting. Given the warning by VC, I'm going to leave this thread and wait for Fashionista's answer. |
Lin while toodles may have asked a legitimate question, you seem to be baiting a mod with your last two posts. Maybe YIF and VC did say it was Ok here maybe they should have talked to Fashionista before saying anything. Her rules were very clear and if you don't like it there is a forum for complaints .All I know is that both the mods and administration work very hard putting up with all the BS and I wouldn't want to be in their shoes even if I was paid the big bucks 
|
|
Joined: 25 Mar 2006
Posts: 5187
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Fashionista
Posted:
Sun Jul 13, 2008 1:31 pm |
|
|
|
Re: Question for Admin/Mods
| toodles wrote: | I'm confused as to the new rules and dont want banned or timed out. I'm not the only one struggling to understand so I'd like to ask.
Are we allowed to call Beth/Joran a lying sack of shit?
I see some of my posts calling Natalee 'Nat' which is what I call her have been edited..is this a no no? I'm confused as I see some edited and some not.
Are descriptive terms to degrade Joran or Beth allowed? Or is just not calling them by their names? Please Help. TIA |
 I thought my post was very clear
I see that only a handful of posters aren't clear
Feel free to PM if you have any questions
|
|
Homeland Security - Refugee Staff
Joined: 23 Mar 2006
Posts: 5299
Location: REFSTAGON
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Mallory
Posted:
Sun Jul 13, 2008 1:32 pm |
|
|
|
| Katie wrote: | | Lin while toodles may have asked a legitimate question, you seem to be baiting a mod with your last two posts. Maybe YIF and VC did say it was Ok here maybe they should have talked to Fashionista before saying anything. Her rules were very clear and if you don't like it there is a forum for complaints .All I know is that both the mods and administration work very hard putting up with all the BS and I wouldn't want to be in their shoes even if I was paid the big bucks |
How is lin agreeing with the mods "baiting" them?
|
|
Joined: 23 Apr 2008
Posts: 1793
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| toodles
Posted:
Sun Jul 13, 2008 1:34 pm |
|
|
|
Re: Question for Admin/Mods
| Fashionista wrote: |
I thought my post was very clear
I see that only a handful of posters aren't clear
Feel free to PM if you have any questions |
Sent you a PM because some of my question wasnt addressed and I want to know the rules. TY
|
|
** Timeout **
Joined: 05 May 2008
Posts: 2388
Location: Lousy Poster
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Katie
Posted:
Sun Jul 13, 2008 1:38 pm |
|
|
|
| Mallory wrote: |
How is lin agreeing with the mods "baiting" them? |
|
|
Joined: 25 Mar 2006
Posts: 5187
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| resigned
Posted:
Sun Jul 13, 2008 1:50 pm |
|
|
|
Re: Question for Admin/Mods
| constantpeace wrote: |
I think that falls under the rule of common sense - but of course, I'm probably wrong |
I don't have tea with Bishops - do I need to belong to an organized religion to post with your ilk? 
|
|
Click your heels together...
Joined: 14 Aug 2006
Posts: 28583
Location: "Onboard" pathenry's desk
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| constantpeace
Posted:
Sun Jul 13, 2008 2:05 pm |
|
|
|
Re: Question for Admin/Mods
| resigned wrote: |
I don't have tea with Bishops - do I need to belong to an organized religion to post with your ilk? |
LOL! What's my ilk???? Where have I ever disclosed any religious (organized or otherwsie) preference? Common sense has nothing to do with "organized religion". But carry on - continue "fighting" the good fight (real or otherwise).
|
|
Joined: 23 Mar 2006
Posts: 258
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| WordsofWisdom
Posted:
Sun Jul 13, 2008 2:17 pm |
|
|
|
| yankee-in-france wrote: | | It is a valid question. Since it is Fash's rule, I would prefer her addressing the scope of the rule for everyone, and I am sure that she will do that when she is on the board. |
Hmmmmm... I had a valid question... you moved it to HE, and then when I persisted, weeks later, it was moved to the appropriate forum "Questions? Suggestions? Comments? Complaints?" and I was attacked, (made fun of) AND interrogated, for even mentioning it, and nothing was said, or done ,to stop it, and you, YIF, were the one leading the interrogation, and allowing the attacks. (because you were part of the conversation and a mod)
I don't get it.
I honestly don't.
|
|
Athena
Joined: 23 Mar 2006
Posts: 9471
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| WordsofWisdom
Posted:
Sun Jul 13, 2008 2:20 pm |
|
|
|
Gawd this is exactly what happened at Websleuths.
And look what happened to THAT board.
|
|
Athena
Joined: 23 Mar 2006
Posts: 9471
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| resigned
Posted:
Sun Jul 13, 2008 2:22 pm |
|
|
|
I miss the ignore feature. 
|
|
Click your heels together...
Joined: 14 Aug 2006
Posts: 28583
Location: "Onboard" pathenry's desk
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| lin
Posted:
Sun Jul 13, 2008 2:52 pm |
|
|
|
| Mallory wrote: |
How is lin agreeing with the mods "baiting" them? |
It's not, Mallory. And I'm sure the mods understand that, despite the attempted spin. Should have been obvious to anyone when I said, "leaving the thread" to await their answer and following through on it.
|
|
Joined: 07 Apr 2008
Posts: 2029
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| victims cry
Posted:
Sun Jul 13, 2008 3:04 pm |
|
|
|
Wow you guys have been busy making a mountain out of a molehill and finding things to fight about.
The way this forum has been the last weeks/months of just fighting, fash hoped that stopping cutesy names from being used for the parties in the case then the threads don't turn into asinine infighting for no reason. Not a person that i can see on this thread has contributed to anything except making a fuss bc someone wanted the rules explained.
Well its not rocket science now i found them. Its a trial to see if there is a ghost of a chance that this forum have any discussion on it that doesn't include beth lover, joran lover or other cutesy nicks for the ppl involved.
If it doesn't we can go back to the old way I asked you to can it...Fash has answered, and so have i now.
so.. post without the silly names for joran or beth or natalee, use common sense and maybe a thread can go on that wont be split  If it becomes to much of an issue we will rethink it. That doesn't mean pm'ing mods with every infraction like its a kindergarten
|
|
On Vacation!
Joined: 22 Mar 2006
Posts: 9307
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| toodles
Posted:
Sun Jul 13, 2008 3:07 pm |
|
|
|
| WordsofWisdom wrote: |
Hmmmmm... I had a valid question... you moved it to HE, and then when I persisted, weeks later, it was moved to the appropriate forum "Questions? Suggestions? Comments? Complaints?" and I was attacked, (made fun of) AND interrogated, for even mentioning it, and nothing was said, or done ,to stop it, and you, YIF, were the one leading the interrogation, and allowing the attacks. (because you were part of the conversation and a mod)
I don't get it.
I honestly don't. |
| SavannahStar wrote: |
You probably should have just PM'd Fash to begin with. |
Change FASH TO YIF.
|
|
** Timeout **
Joined: 05 May 2008
Posts: 2388
Location: Lousy Poster
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| SavannahStar
Posted:
Sun Jul 13, 2008 3:12 pm |
|
|
|
| toodles wrote: |
Change FASH TO YIF. |
I thought it was Fash's rule about the use of "cute" names? Am I mistaken there? I don't quite understand your post.
ETA: OH I SEE......you are quoting ME to answer another poster. 
Last edited by SavannahStar on Sun Jul 13, 2008 3:14 pm; edited 1 time in total
|
|
**SuperStar**
Joined: 24 Mar 2006
Posts: 21295
Location: Midnight in the Garden of Good and Evil
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| toodles
Posted:
Sun Jul 13, 2008 3:12 pm |
|
|
|
| victims cry wrote: | Wow you guys have been busy making a mountain out of a molehill and finding things to fight about.
The way this forum has been the last weeks/months of just fighting, fash hoped that stopping cutesy names from being used for the parties in the case then the threads don't turn into asinine infighting for no reason. Not a person that i can see on this thread has contributed to anything except making a fuss bc someone wanted the rules explained.Well its not rocket science now i found them. Its a trial to see if there is a ghost of a chance that this forum have any discussion on it that doesn't include beth lover, joran lover or other cutesy nicks for the ppl involved.
If it doesn't we can go back to the old way I asked you to can it...Fash has answered, and so have i now.
so.. post without the silly names for joran or beth or natalee, use common sense and maybe a thread can go on that wont be split If it becomes to much of an issue we will rethink it. That doesn't mean pm'ing mods with every infraction like its a kindergarten |
TY. I didnt intend to start a fight I just was unsure about something and felt it best to ask rather than do it and break the rules. Others were curious as well. Fash answered nicely and I appreciate it alot.
|
|
** Timeout **
Joined: 05 May 2008
Posts: 2388
Location: Lousy Poster
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| SavannahStar
Posted:
Sun Jul 13, 2008 3:15 pm |
|
|
|
| Alvin wrote: |
My 8 month old German Shepherd eats Pit-Bulls.
|
That's really uncalled for.
|
|
**SuperStar**
Joined: 24 Mar 2006
Posts: 21295
Location: Midnight in the Garden of Good and Evil
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Katie
Posted:
Sun Jul 13, 2008 3:18 pm |
|
|
|
| toodles wrote: |
Change FASH TO YIF. |
WTF, hopefully neither YIF or administration will put up with That BS. 
|
|
Joined: 25 Mar 2006
Posts: 5187
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| toodles
Posted:
Sun Jul 13, 2008 3:25 pm |
|
|
|
| Katie wrote: |
WTF, hopefully neither YIF or administration will put up with That BS. |
What for saying change Fash's name to YIFS in the post I posted ..wtf is wrong with that?
SS posted I should PM Fash my question..I said that poster she PM YIF hers. Is this just a see what can be twisted day?
|
|
** Timeout **
Joined: 05 May 2008
Posts: 2388
Location: Lousy Poster
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| toodles
Posted:
Sun Jul 13, 2008 3:26 pm |
|
|
|
| SavannahStar wrote: |
I thought it was Fash's rule about the use of "cute" names? Am I mistaken there? I don't quite understand your post.
ETA: OH I SEE......you are quoting ME to answer another poster. |
Yes,,sorry I wasnt more clear.
|
|
** Timeout **
Joined: 05 May 2008
Posts: 2388
Location: Lousy Poster
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| eleanor rigby
Posted:
Sun Jul 13, 2008 3:30 pm |
|
|
|
| toodles wrote: |
Yes,,sorry I wasnt more clear. |
Maybe it was just a dash of logorrhea.
|
|
Joined: 24 Mar 2006
Posts: 1970
Location: Tony and Tatiana
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
