Prosecutor says that Van der Sloot obstructed investigation
Last edited by liesbeth on Wed Oct 22, 2008 4:42 pm; edited 1 time in total
Joined: 05 Jul 2008
Posts: 908
liesbethPosted:
Thu Oct 02, 2008 3:48 pm
Last edited by liesbeth on Wed Oct 22, 2008 4:42 pm; edited 1 time in total
Joined: 05 Jul 2008
Posts: 908
GregorPosted:
Thu Oct 02, 2008 3:56 pm
Re: Prosecutor says that Van der Sloot obstructed investigat
liesbeth wrote:
This is the transcript of the video, yadda, yadda, yadda.
I hope you don't think an article more than three years old is news.
Why don't you also post the later published articles about Paulus being exonerated and released from suspect status?
Joined: 23 Mar 2006
Posts: 1379
all10suspectsPosted:
Thu Oct 02, 2008 4:07 pm
Re: Prosecutor says that Van der Sloot obstructed investigat
Gregor wrote:
I hope you don't think an article more than three years old is news.
Why don't you also post the later published articles about Paulus being exonerated and released from suspect status?
And denied his money becuase the ALE had a reason to arrest him!
Joined: 20 Jul 2006
Posts: 6199
GregorPosted:
Thu Oct 02, 2008 4:13 pm
Re: Prosecutor says that Van der Sloot obstructed investigat
all10suspects wrote:
And denied his money becuase the ALE had a reason to arrest him!
Does that make him guilty of anything?
Joined: 23 Mar 2006
Posts: 1379
billybobPosted:
Thu Oct 02, 2008 4:35 pm
Re: Prosecutor says that Van der Sloot obstructed investigat
Gregor wrote:
I hope you don't think an article more than three years old is news.
Why don't you also post the later published articles about Paulus being exonerated and released from suspect status?
Why does't Liesbeth find and archives of all the old discussions some where so we do not have to rehash 3 year old BS again?
Joined: 12 Oct 2007
Posts: 2494
GregorPosted:
Thu Oct 02, 2008 4:44 pm
Re: Prosecutor says that Van der Sloot obstructed investigat
billybob wrote:
Why does't Liesbeth find and archives of all the old discussions some where so we do not have to rehash 3 year old BS again?
I wonder if her title, "Prosecutor says that Van der Sloot obstructed investigation," was just a grammatical error, or an attempt to deceive.
Joined: 23 Mar 2006
Posts: 1379
dugoPosted:
Thu Oct 02, 2008 7:44 pm
groundhog day?
Dashing Dutch Dynamo Dude
Joined: 12 Apr 2006
Posts: 5971
Location: L4L
GlendaPosted:
Fri Oct 03, 2008 12:00 am
dugo wrote:
groundhog day?
ditto! x 3 years
The Good Witch
Joined: 23 Mar 2006
Posts: 5697
liesbethPosted:
Fri Oct 03, 2008 12:22 am
Re: Prosecutor says that Van der Sloot obstructed investigat
Last edited by liesbeth on Wed Oct 22, 2008 4:43 pm; edited 1 time in total
Joined: 05 Jul 2008
Posts: 908
dugoPosted:
Fri Oct 03, 2008 2:04 am
NOVA translation looks exactly the same to me as 3 years ago...
Dashing Dutch Dynamo Dude
Joined: 12 Apr 2006
Posts: 5971
Location: L4L
BongoPosted:
Fri Oct 03, 2008 2:04 am
Re: Prosecutor says that Van der Sloot obstructed investigat
liesbeth wrote:
Because Joran and his parents are proven liars. The three of them (Joran, his father AND mother) are sneaky and manipulative in trying to involve other people.
Since the Joran tape things have changed.
Besides that: what Karin Jansen and Hans Mos state about Joran and his parents (that those people are liars) are facts.
LIAR-LIAR-LIAR
lol
Joined: 29 Mar 2008
Posts: 988
Location: The Netherlands
henkPosted:
Fri Oct 03, 2008 3:09 am
Re: Prosecutor says that Van der Sloot obstructed investigat
Bongo wrote:
LIAR-LIAR-LIAR
lol
Joined: 25 Apr 2008
Posts: 698
Location: nederland
henkPosted:
Fri Oct 03, 2008 3:13 am
Hans Mos.. 26 febr. 2008
Joined: 25 Apr 2008
Posts: 698
Location: nederland
BongoPosted:
Fri Oct 03, 2008 5:48 am
henk wrote:
Hans Mos.. 26 febr. 2008
Pfff.. two faces? I do recall him being 'interrogated' in a manipulative way by Peter the Great.. answering in such a silly way..
Here he sounds quite different..
''The investigation has been ruled by the American tabloid press'' [for his ease forgot to mention Peter the Great's 'show' ]
Joined: 29 Mar 2008
Posts: 988
Location: The Netherlands
liesbethPosted:
Fri Oct 03, 2008 10:07 am
Re: Prosecutor says that Van der Sloot obstructed investigat
Last edited by liesbeth on Wed Oct 22, 2008 4:43 pm; edited 1 time in total
Joined: 05 Jul 2008
Posts: 908
BongoPosted:
Fri Oct 03, 2008 10:20 am
liesbeth wrote:
Who is manipulating here?
Interesting. How am I manipulating? Who is being intimidated, coerced, pressured or even brainwashed by me?
Joined: 29 Mar 2008
Posts: 988
Location: The Netherlands
enfant terriblePosted:
Fri Oct 03, 2008 10:25 am
Back to square one
Quote:
"father talked with the boys about the fact that there will be no case without a body. And that is information what possible, and that is not to exclude, was for the boys an important element for the way they are stating. "
1. Joran asked a simple question:
Joran then asked his father: And if they don't find a body?
2. Father answered the question:
His father answered: No, if they don't find a body then you are not that much into trouble.
Nothing more nothing less
Quote:
And that same evening, the contents of this statement was told to Joran by his lawyer. And I can tell you that this fact, softly speaking, is rather disturbing in an investigation.
Only one way to know this: illegally eavesdropping on client lawyer discussions
***Deactivated: Pending Review***
Joined: 04 Jun 2008
Posts: 834
Location: Naughty Stool, Alabama
Need2KnowPosted:
Fri Oct 03, 2008 10:31 am
Re: Prosecutor says that Van der Sloot obstructed investigat
billybob wrote:
Why does't Liesbeth find and archives of all the old discussions some where so we do not have to rehash 3 year old BS again?
Why don't you complain when Slickster does the same thing except Slick's are from the internet posters, this one is from a prosecutor.
N2K
Joined: 06 Jul 2006
Posts: 8847
liesbethPosted:
Fri Oct 03, 2008 10:40 am
Re: Prosecutor says that Van der Sloot obstructed investigat
Last edited by liesbeth on Wed Oct 22, 2008 4:44 pm; edited 1 time in total
Joined: 05 Jul 2008
Posts: 908
SlicksterPosted:
Fri Oct 03, 2008 10:49 am
Re: Prosecutor says that Van der Sloot obstructed investigat
Need2Know wrote:
Why don't you complain when Slickster does the same thing except Slick's are from the internet posters, this one is from a prosecutor.
Roll Tide!
Joined: 29 Jun 2006
Posts: 1562
Need2KnowPosted:
Fri Oct 03, 2008 10:58 am
Re: Prosecutor says that Van der Sloot obstructed investigat
Slickster wrote:
Roll Tide!
You have me confused with a Beth or MB supporter I just support justice and truth not heresay, speculation and wild theories, just go ask Joran to come clean and you can all move along
I'm a Gator who lives south with the palm trees
N2K
Joined: 06 Jul 2006
Posts: 8847
enfant terriblePosted:
Fri Oct 03, 2008 11:02 am
Quote:
Backmasking (also known as backward masking) is a recording technique in which a sound or message is recorded backward onto a track that is meant to be played forward. Backmasking is a deliberate process, whereas a message found through phonetic reversal may be unintentional.
Quote:
Quote:
The early investigations, the early statements and the findings then are most relevant.
"the answer is in their somewhere"
***Deactivated: Pending Review***
Joined: 04 Jun 2008
Posts: 834
Location: Naughty Stool, Alabama
SlicksterPosted:
Fri Oct 03, 2008 11:18 am
enfant terrible wrote:
Quote:
Backmasking (also known as backward masking) is a recording technique in which a sound or message is recorded backward onto a track that is meant to be played forward. Backmasking is a deliberate process, whereas a message found through phonetic reversal may be unintentional.
Quote:
Quote:
The early investigations, the early statements and the findings then are most relevant.
"the answer is in their somewhere"
Yeah Buddy.
Those early posts tell the whole story. Too bad most of it has been laundered, but the answer is still there.
MB BRATS -- Enuff said.
Roll Tide!
Joined: 29 Jun 2006
Posts: 1562
billybobPosted:
Fri Oct 03, 2008 11:23 am
Re: Prosecutor says that Van der Sloot obstructed investigat
liesbeth wrote:
Because this is relevant Billybob.
The early investigations, the early statements and the findings then are most relevant.
Didn't you know?
Yes and based on all of those early investigtions all 3 --- yes all 3 were released - and Paul was 100% cleared of being a suspect.
All times are GMT - 5 Hours Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4Next
Page 1 of 4
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
I just support justice and truth 
