| Has all the evidence been leaked out and seen already? - Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3 |
| View previous topic
:: View next topic |
Linda in L.A.
 Posted:
Fri Feb 05, 2010 6:01 am |
|
|
|
Re: 3 days....
| cajun_mali wrote: |
Which days did they "clean up"?
J&D were out partying the Tues Night, Joran was in school the next day when you seem to assume ALE was watching. |
Huh? I don't "assume" ALE was watching. I said they weren't. Try reading cajun. As for J&D being out partying...you don't know what they were doing now do you? All you know is what they said they were doing.
|
|
Joined: 12 Apr 2006
Posts: 1813
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
| cajun_mali
Posted:
Fri Feb 05, 2010 6:33 am |
|
|
|
Re: 3 days....
| Linda in L.A. wrote: |
Huh? I don't "assume" ALE was watching. I said they weren't. Try reading cajun. As for J&D being out partying...you don't know what they were doing now do you? All you know is what they said they were doing. |
No witnesses? I'm glad you don't. I don't make many assumptions either.
|
|
Joined: 24 May 2007
Posts: 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| iquitos
Posted:
Fri Feb 05, 2010 7:37 am |
|
|
|
she was given access to some
in confidence and must have sneaked a copy or two (minox camera?). others came out of the garbage courtesy of mr. mansour, so they tell. she herself said she had to smuggle the stuff of the island of aruba (microdots?). we never got the real story on how it got out into the www. her fingerprints are all over that little caper.
Last edited by iquitos on Sun Feb 07, 2010 9:47 pm; edited 1 time in total
|
|
Joined: 26 Mar 2006
Posts: 18725
Location: in my mind's eye
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| henk
Posted:
Fri Feb 05, 2010 8:28 am |
|
|
|
Re: 3 days....
| Linda in L.A. wrote: |
Dompig says they were monitored after 3 days of Natalee being reported missing. Day 1...understandable I suppose they wouldn't monitor JK2 because they didn't believe Natalee wasn't just partying.
Day 2...Beth arrived and the police went with her to Joran's home. That was at night...so understandable I suppose they couldn't legally begin a surveillance on JK2.
Day 3...what the heck happened? Dompg says after the 3rd day. Did ALE bother in the first 3 days to try to find any evidence on the beach? This is a question...I don't know the answer...but I don't remember hearing they did.
Did they "ask" Paulus if they could look in the house for Natalee? Did they "ask" if they could check out Deepak's car? Not sure of the laws on Aruba...more than likely they would need a court order to force the issues...but did they ask?
Why did it take Beth to go to the casino and find out who Natalee was with? Why didn't the police do that the first day Natalee was reported missing? If not the first day...why not the next day? Even so...ALE went with the group not in an official capacity apparently...but more in a peacekeeping capacity. Why? |
Gerold Dompig On '48 Hours'
Dompig didn't say AFTER 3 days.. He said THE third day..
http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=1433650n&tag=related;photovideo
|
|
Joined: 25 Apr 2008
Posts: 1333
Location: nederland
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Linda in L.A.
Posted:
Fri Feb 05, 2010 9:29 am |
|
|
|
Re: 3 days....
Maybe its interpretation?? Dompig was asked. How soon after
Natalee was reported missing did you begin conducting surveillance of the 3 boys?
Dompig's answer: The third day.
It may be splitting hairs...but he didn't say within 3 days. Like I said above...when is Dompig referring to when Natalee was reported missing? Was it when her friends were told to report it to the Beach Patrol? Was it when Beth went to have the police follow them to Joran's house? Or was it when Beth and Jug went to the police station the next day and the whole "Gotta shave and eat breakfast" thing happened? [/b]
|
|
Joined: 12 Apr 2006
Posts: 1813
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| AlwaysL8
Posted:
Fri Feb 05, 2010 11:16 am |
|
|
|
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9679791/
| Quote: | Dompig: <snip>
Thirdly, don‘t forget that we have very soon, within the window frame of eight, nine days, we started to monitor them, meaning that sometimes choosing the moment of arresting depends on whether you think that you have monitored enough or that you want to monitor a little further. |
3 days...........8-9 days.........not at all ??
|
|
Joined: 05 Dec 2007
Posts: 1442
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| cajun_mali
Posted:
Fri Feb 05, 2010 11:52 am |
|
|
|
| AlwaysL8 wrote: | http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9679791/
| Quote: | Dompig: <snip>
Thirdly, don‘t forget that we have very soon, within the window frame of eight, nine days, we started to monitor them, meaning that sometimes choosing the moment of arresting depends on whether you think that you have monitored enough or that you want to monitor a little further. |
3 days...........8-9 days.........not at all ?? |
It may have done nothing to prove innocence, and maybe MAYBE a chance of proving guilt. I wish we knew.
|
|
Joined: 24 May 2007
Posts: 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| iquitos
Posted:
Fri Feb 05, 2010 12:11 pm |
|
|
|
day one (Monday)
- club closed and natalee left with her new friends for the shark show. they did whatever they did and joran got hom however he did very late indeed but sit go to school to sleep it off.
- the vigilantes from alabama arrived either around 7 or around 10 and started their search for a framee. the settled on joran early on day two.
day two (Tuesday)
- joran again went to school to sleep it off after the vigilantes kept him up all night and then his dad took him to the cops. the vigilantes also came after him at school.
day three (Wednesday) she is already launching her media campaign. At some point they actually report to the consulate that Natalee is missing.
.
Last edited by iquitos on Fri Feb 05, 2010 4:16 pm; edited 1 time in total
|
|
Joined: 26 Mar 2006
Posts: 18725
Location: in my mind's eye
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Slickster
Posted:
Fri Feb 05, 2010 2:30 pm |
|
|
|
Re: 3 days....
| Linda in L.A. wrote: |
Maybe its interpretation?? Dompig was asked. How soon after
Natalee was reported missing did you begin conducting surveillance of the 3 boys?
Dompig's answer: The third day.
It may be splitting hairs...but he didn't say within 3 days. Like I said above...when is Dompig referring to when Natalee was reported missing? Was it when her friends were told to report it to the Beach Patrol? Was it when Beth went to have the police follow them to Joran's house? Or was it when Beth and Jug went to the police station the next day and the whole "Gotta shave and eat breakfast" thing happened? [/b] |
Never happened.
Another one of the many of Beth's Lies.
|
|
*** Indefinite Timeout ***
Joined: 29 Jun 2006
Posts: 2206
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| AlwaysL8
Posted:
Fri Feb 05, 2010 2:36 pm |
|
|
|
Re: 3 days....
| Slickster wrote: |
Never happened.
Another one of the many of Beth's Lies.
|
And you know this how? Come on, give us an answer for once and show some credibility. 
|
|
Joined: 05 Dec 2007
Posts: 1442
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| INK
Posted:
Sat Feb 06, 2010 6:28 pm |
|
|
|
Re: Has all the evidence been leaked out and seen already?
| cajun_mali wrote: |
Many people get convicted without a body.
Opinion, yours or mine, is neither proof nor fact.
You say I take this too seriously ... how long have YOU been peddling your two cents?
No-one .. NO-ONE ... at ALE is covering for j2k. None has ever. |
People can get convicted without a body, but they can't get convicted with NO evidence of a crime at all. That's why this case is still where it is. Where is the evidence of a crime having been comitted? Beth's say so? The American media's say so? That just wasn't enough, and it never will be.
|
|
Joined: 24 Aug 2009
Posts: 24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| WangChung
Posted:
Sat Feb 06, 2010 6:44 pm |
|
|
|
Re: Has all the evidence been leaked out and seen already?
| INK wrote: |
People can get convicted without a body, but they can't get convicted with NO evidence of a crime at all. That's why this case is still where it is. Where is the evidence of a crime having been comitted? Beth's say so? The American media's say so? That just wasn't enough, and it never will be. |
Yoo Hoo!! Silver Platter, anyone? 
|
|
Everybody Have Fun Tonight
Joined: 23 Mar 2006
Posts: 11943
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Slickster
Posted:
Sat Feb 06, 2010 8:36 pm |
|
|
|
Re: Has all the evidence been leaked out and seen already?
| WangChung wrote: |
Yoo Hoo!! Silver Platter, anyone? |
|
|
*** Indefinite Timeout ***
Joined: 29 Jun 2006
Posts: 2206
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
