| What happens when an innocent man is convicted. - Goto page Previous 1, 2 |
| View previous topic
:: View next topic |
JesseLee
Posted:
Sun Jun 04, 2006 8:03 pm |
|
|
|
| HannieC wrote: | | Thanks for your link in the email Abarth BTW! I`m going tuesday and will have a look. I think i can make copies of articles than or not? |
That's so great that you can check into this for us HannieC! I think it is very important information to have and I know you, medley, and others do too! So good luck on Tuesday -- I'm thrilled that Shaft'Orange is on the case!
|
|
Joined: 23 Mar 2006
Posts: 2458
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Abarth
Posted:
Sun Jun 04, 2006 8:08 pm |
|
|
|
| HannieC wrote: | | Thanks for your link in the email Abarth BTW! I`m going tuesday and will have a look. I think i can make copies of articles than or not? |
I would think you could at least print them and if that is not possible you could write down the titles/dates/newspaper of articles that are interesting.
As a general remark ... tunnelvision in high profile cases is unfortunately not uncommon at all. I do remember the Birmingham six, the Guilford four (UK cases) and in Holland 'De Paskamermoord', the 'Schiedammer parkmoord' and the 'Puttense moordzaak'. In the works is "De Deventer moord" and yesterday I heard a new case seems to be coming up "De zaak Lucia de B."
|
|
Joined: 24 Mar 2006
Posts: 1685
Location: Utreg
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Daniel
Posted:
Sun Jun 04, 2006 9:32 pm |
|
|
|
| Abarth wrote: | | I also discovered today that the electronic newspaper archives are accessible in a number of libraries here. So maybe someone is able to do that. |
I think all public libraries have that - it's called Krantenbank. It offers free access to the archives of several major Dutch newspapers.
|
|
Joined: 23 Mar 2006
Posts: 381
Location: NL
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Daniel
Posted:
Sun Jun 04, 2006 9:53 pm |
|
|
|
| medleyrelay wrote: | There is no question her tunnel vision in this Venlo case caused a couple of these young men to suffer from being falsely accused and CONVICTED
apparently only DNA proved their convictions wrong!
Karin has had a tunnel vision approach with Joran since day 1 -- she has messed up badly in this investigation. |
"No question"??
First of all, I'm not at all convinced that she was involved with that case.
Secondly, that case is generally considered a victory for the prosecution because they managed to get people convicted for murder even though the victims' bodies were never found. If you think the verdict was wrong, it's not the prosecutor but the defense attorneys and the judges who screwed up.
As for tunnel vision in the Natalee Holloway case, I don't think so at all, but we won't know that until the case is either dropped or taken to court.
|
|
Joined: 23 Mar 2006
Posts: 381
Location: NL
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
BhamMom
Posted:
Sun Jun 04, 2006 11:12 pm |
|
|
|
Usually an "innocent" man doesn't get convicted, just convicted of the wrong crime. If Steven Avery is such an "innocent" man, why did he do what he did? They are usually "wrongfully" convicted but not "innocently" convicted.
|
|
** Banned **
Joined: 23 Mar 2006
Posts: 13086
Location: Posting with bitter people
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Hannie
Posted:
Mon Jun 05, 2006 11:10 am |
|
|
|
| Daniel wrote: | | medleyrelay wrote: | There is no question her tunnel vision in this Venlo case caused a couple of these young men to suffer from being falsely accused and CONVICTED
apparently only DNA proved their convictions wrong!
Karin has had a tunnel vision approach with Joran since day 1 -- she has messed up badly in this investigation. |
"No question"??
First of all, I'm not at all convinced that she was involved with that case.
Secondly, that case is generally considered a victory for the prosecution because they managed to get people convicted for murder even though the victims' bodies were never found. If you think the verdict was wrong, it's not the prosecutor but the defense attorneys and the judges who screwed up.
As for tunnel vision in the Natalee Holloway case, I don't think so at all, but we won't know that until the case is either dropped or taken to court. |
Her name popped up in one of the articles I bought Daan, so i think she was indeed on this case, but maybe tomorrow i`ll e sure.......As far as I know there were more than one aanklagers on the case...
|
|
li'l Shango's Mommy

Joined: 23 Mar 2006
Posts: 23202
Location: The Hague, The Netherlands
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Hannie
Posted:
Mon Jun 05, 2006 11:11 am |
|
|
|
| Abarth wrote: | | HannieC wrote: | | Thanks for your link in the email Abarth BTW! I`m going tuesday and will have a look. I think i can make copies of articles than or not? |
I would think you could at least print them and if that is not possible you could write down the titles/dates/newspaper of articles that are interesting.
As a general remark ... tunnelvision in high profile cases is unfortunately not uncommon at all. I do remember the Birmingham six, the Guilford four (UK cases) and in Holland 'De Paskamermoord', the 'Schiedammer parkmoord' and the 'Puttense moordzaak'. In the works is "De Deventer moord" and yesterday I heard a new case seems to be coming up "De zaak Lucia de B."  |
O yes, that`s absolutely true about all those cases!
|
|
li'l Shango's Mommy

Joined: 23 Mar 2006
Posts: 23202
Location: The Hague, The Netherlands
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|