| FBI 302 of Lee Ashford Broughton - Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4 ... 48, 49, 50 Next |
| View previous topic
:: View next topic |
WordsofWisdom
 Posted:
Thu Feb 01, 2007 10:48 pm |
|
|
|
The taxi ride there.....
LeeB, Natalee, Tracy and "2 others".
Now why wouldn't they put those 2 names in the 302?
That is more than strange.
Was it the Twitty Twins again?
And is this the infamous taxi ride where Natalee said she was "in love with w Blue Eyed Dutch Boy" and they all got into an argument?
These 302 statements are seriously lacking professionalism and thoroughness- I expected a REAL interview from the FBI- not this! After all, this is supposedly a "missing" girl. Something fuzzy about these FBI interviews, thats for sure! Harry says the agent in charge of that Birmingham office is friends of the MB folks... true?
|
|
Gone to the great place in the sky
Joined: 23 Mar 2006
Posts: 12505
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
| WangChung
Posted:
Thu Feb 01, 2007 10:48 pm |
|
|
|
| pawleys wrote: |
Time for the infamous FEB quote... 
| Quote: | SCARBOROUGH: Let me ask you, Frances Ellen, when is the last time you saw her?
BYRD: That night.
SCARBOROUGH: Yes, you saw her the night...
BYRD: I was with her that night.
SCARBOROUGH: You were with her that night.
BYRD: Yes. Yes.
SCARBOROUGH: All the friends went back to the hotel. And did you all see her go back to the hotel or not?
BYRD: I am just leaving it that we saw her there.
SCARBOROUGH: Saw her that night.
BYRD: Right. | |
|
|
Everybody Have Fun Tonight
Joined: 23 Mar 2006
Posts: 11943
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| WordsofWisdom
Posted:
Thu Feb 01, 2007 10:51 pm |
|
|
|
FEB looks a bit pregnant in a couple of those pics.
Wonder whose private plane that is.
|
|
Gone to the great place in the sky
Joined: 23 Mar 2006
Posts: 12505
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Vladimir Repnin-Volkonsky
Posted:
Thu Feb 01, 2007 10:55 pm |
|
|
|
Interesting set of pictures, for a number of reasons. One of which is clear in all.
note carefully:
her grip in all pictures
at the bottom of the bottle, cup, mug, vessel, JUG
the baby finger inserted underneath to cradle it.
either a learned through obseveration of "gentlemanly" whisky drinking grandfather'rism, or a hard core practiced drunk gripping, cradling and balancing, ensuring that not even one drop gets spilt.
And goes to waste
|
|
** Banned **
Joined: 24 Oct 2006
Posts: 553
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| WangChung
Posted:
Thu Feb 01, 2007 10:57 pm |
|
|
|
| WordsofWisdom wrote: | FEB looks a bit pregnant in a couple of those pics.
Wonder whose private plane that is. |
Frannie  never goes anyplace without her alcoholic pacifier. A young drunk hiding behind an ethanol hedge. Sort of like Beth before time took its toll.
Good thing the Youth Minister was there to run interference during Frannie's famous statement. Otherwise, the alcohol besotted bimbo might have told us what really happened to Natalee.
|
|
Everybody Have Fun Tonight
Joined: 23 Mar 2006
Posts: 11943
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| DiamondDot
Posted:
Thu Feb 01, 2007 11:09 pm |
|
|
|
IMO, Beth is not at all concerned about Natalee right now. Her focus is on herself and the divorce.
Beth allowing the publication of the 302 right now could be that it contains something that could be detrimental to Jug.
~~OR~~
Lee is ready to 'sing'. This is Beth's pre-emptive strike, alerting us to it.
|
|
Double D
Joined: 24 Mar 2006
Posts: 9155
Location: Surfin' the Rhythms of the Universe
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| tulsad
Posted:
Thu Feb 01, 2007 11:13 pm |
|
|
|
| DiamondDot wrote: | IMO, Beth is not at all concerned about Natalee right now. Her focus is on herself and the divorce.
Beth allowing the publication of the 302 right now could be that it contains something that could be detrimental to Jug.
~~OR~~
Lee is ready to 'sing'. This is Beth's pre-emptive strike, alerting us to it. |
How could Beth stop the publication of the 302?
ETA: "Lee is ready to 'sing'." Now wouldn't that be something?? 
|
|
Sparkly Tree
Joined: 19 Aug 2006
Posts: 10338
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Lazlo
Posted:
Thu Feb 01, 2007 11:27 pm |
|
|
|
| Heli wrote: |
She merely did not know his last name at the date of giving her
statement to the FBI on June 3, 2007. |
Page 2 of her statements shows: June 1 2005.
(no idea why)
|
|
Joined: 23 Mar 2006
Posts: 1721
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| tulsad
Posted:
Thu Feb 01, 2007 11:36 pm |
|
|
|
| Lazlo wrote: | | Heli wrote: |
She merely did not know his last name at the date of giving her
statement to the FBI on June 3, 2007. |
Page 2 of her statements shows: June 1 2005.
(no idea why) |
It's rather hard to read, but at the bottom of page 1 you can see: date of investigation June 1, 2005; date of dictation June 3, 2005. Page 2 shows June 3 as the date transcribed.
|
|
Sparkly Tree
Joined: 19 Aug 2006
Posts: 10338
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| WangChung
Posted:
Thu Feb 01, 2007 11:36 pm |
|
|
|
| tulsad wrote: | | DiamondDot wrote: | IMO, Beth is not at all concerned about Natalee right now. Her focus is on herself and the divorce.
Beth allowing the publication of the 302 right now could be that it contains something that could be detrimental to Jug.
~~OR~~
Lee is ready to 'sing'. This is Beth's pre-emptive strike, alerting us to it. |
How could Beth stop the publication of the 302?
ETA: "Lee is ready to 'sing'." Now wouldn't that be something?? |
DD, you have often been on the money concerning Beth's pre-emptive strikes. Beth will go out of her way to discredit upcoming information if she feels it will catch her in a lie...as it often does.
I'm still waiting for Beth to provide evidence of the 911 call she claims to have made when Natalee was "KIDNAPPED!!!!!" 
Could Lee Broughton's 'nightmares' finally have gotten the better of her? Is Lee ready to open her slutty mouth and tell the truth about Natalee's drunkeness, drug use and disappearance? Could this be the break in the case Aruba has been waiting for after spending $MILLIONS$ of dollars of the island's money to look for Beth's runaway daughter? 
|
|
Everybody Have Fun Tonight
Joined: 23 Mar 2006
Posts: 11943
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| statinmyopinion2
Posted:
Thu Feb 01, 2007 11:37 pm |
|
|
|
| tulsad wrote: | | DiamondDot wrote: | IMO, Beth is not at all concerned about Natalee right now. Her focus is on herself and the divorce.
Beth allowing the publication of the 302 right now could be that it contains something that could be detrimental to Jug.
~~OR~~
Lee is ready to 'sing'. This is Beth's pre-emptive strike, alerting us to it. |
How could Beth stop the publication of the 302?
ETA: "Lee is ready to 'sing'." Now wouldn't that be something?? |
Hmmm Lee is going to tell us, exactly what happened on that night, that has caused her severe nightmares/flashbacks. She may even speak up about Natalee's home life...(book deal??)
Maybe she is doing a show with NBC/CBS and that is why these two stations were in Aruba recently.
Maybe it is just as simple as Lee couldn't live with the GUILT of what she knows any longer and is going to TELL ALL.
That is why the pre-emptive strike in getting her 302's out, to start the discrediting of Lee. Got to put those "fires out".
|
|
HMI, we are still watching you!
Joined: 25 Mar 2006
Posts: 2308
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| LiBsTeR
Posted:
Thu Feb 01, 2007 11:38 pm |
|
|
|
| Vladimir Repnin-Volkonsky wrote: | I'd still like to know what this "spinster" is doing in high school at that age
As a practical matter, while laws in most states mandate school attendance at least until graduation or age 16, many require attendance until age 17 or 18. (However, enforcement of truancy laws is sporadic.) Conversely, students who have failed a grade may remain in high school past the age of 18. In general, students over 18 attend alternative classes to receive a GED. State laws vary on the cut-off age for students to receive free public education services. Many states have adult high schools for people generally 19 and over.
Was she on the short bus programme at Mountain Brook perhaps?
Or were the truancy laws just that, too sporadic |
October 2, 1986 means she graduated high school at 18 and she is now 20
|
|
Joined: 11 Jan 2007
Posts: 380
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Vladimir Repnin-Volkonsky
Posted:
Thu Feb 01, 2007 11:39 pm |
|
|
|
Investigation Date is: 06/01/2005
on both pages
Date Discussed: 06/03/2005
Believe the reference to the first on the second page is as above
|
|
** Banned **
Joined: 24 Oct 2006
Posts: 553
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| tulsad
Posted:
Thu Feb 01, 2007 11:40 pm |
|
|
|
| WangChung wrote: | | tulsad wrote: | | DiamondDot wrote: | IMO, Beth is not at all concerned about Natalee right now. Her focus is on herself and the divorce.
Beth allowing the publication of the 302 right now could be that it contains something that could be detrimental to Jug.
~~OR~~
Lee is ready to 'sing'. This is Beth's pre-emptive strike, alerting us to it. |
How could Beth stop the publication of the 302?
ETA: "Lee is ready to 'sing'." Now wouldn't that be something?? |
DD, you have often been on the money concerning Beth's pre-emptive strikes. Beth will go out of her way to discredit upcoming information if she feels it will catch her in a lie...as it often does.
I'm still waiting for Beth to provide evidence of the 911 call she claims to have made when Natalee was "KIDNAPPED!!!!!"
Could Lee Broughton's 'nightmares' finally have gotten the better of her? Is Lee ready to open her slutty mouth and tell the truth about Natalee's drunkeness, drug use and disappearance? Could this be the break in the case Aruba has been waiting for after spending $MILLIONS$ of dollars of the island's money to look for Beth's runaway daughter? |
I repeat, now wouldn't that be something? A conscience being the downfall of this complicated stack of dominoes - wow!
|
|
Sparkly Tree
Joined: 19 Aug 2006
Posts: 10338
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Heli
Posted:
Thu Feb 01, 2007 11:42 pm |
|
|
|
Ruth McVay, Lee Ashford Broughton, Mary Lassiter Wood
New Year, 2007
|
|
Transcription Goddess
Joined: 23 Mar 2006
Posts: 24630
Location: Puffed Up DimWit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| WangChung
Posted:
Thu Feb 01, 2007 11:42 pm |
|
|
|
| statinmyopinion2 wrote: | | tulsad wrote: | | DiamondDot wrote: | IMO, Beth is not at all concerned about Natalee right now. Her focus is on herself and the divorce.
Beth allowing the publication of the 302 right now could be that it contains something that could be detrimental to Jug.
~~OR~~
Lee is ready to 'sing'. This is Beth's pre-emptive strike, alerting us to it. |
How could Beth stop the publication of the 302?
ETA: "Lee is ready to 'sing'." Now wouldn't that be something?? |
Hmmm Lee is going to tell us, exactly what happened on that night, that has caused her severe nightmares/flashbacks. She may even speak up about Natalee's home life...(book deal??)
Maybe she is doing a show with NBC/CBS and that is why these two stations were in Aruba recently.
Maybe it is just as simple as Lee couldn't live with the GUILT of what she knows any longer and is going to TELL ALL.
That is why the pre-emptive strike in getting her 302's out, to start the discrediting of Lee. Got to put those "fires out". |
Fortunately, Beth is too stupid or too besotted to have counted on the fact that Lee's family will have consulted with attorneys before allowing her to go public. What will Lee be able to tell the public about the House of Horrors that Natalee might have lived in with Beth and Jug? Drunkeness? Abuse? Illegal activities? Drug use? Financial scams? Beth 'forgetting' to flush the toilet?
This should be interesting! 
|
|
Everybody Have Fun Tonight
Joined: 23 Mar 2006
Posts: 11943
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| LiBsTeR
Posted:
Thu Feb 01, 2007 11:44 pm |
|
|
|
| Vladimir Repnin-Volkonsky wrote: | Investigation Date is: 06/01/2005
on both pages
Date Discussed: 06/03/2005
Believe the reference to the first on the second page is as above |
I'm not sure what that has to do with her birthday because that doesn't change. she would have been 18 at the time of the interview 19 her first year in college and 20 this fall.
|
|
Joined: 11 Jan 2007
Posts: 380
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| WangChung
Posted:
Thu Feb 01, 2007 11:44 pm |
|
|
|
| Heli wrote: | Ruth McVay, Lee Ashford Broughton, Mary Lassiter Wood
New Year, 2007
|
Saggy breasts, big hips and the smiles of the Redneck Wealthy. Yee Haw!! 
|
|
Everybody Have Fun Tonight
Joined: 23 Mar 2006
Posts: 11943
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Vladimir Repnin-Volkonsky
Posted:
Thu Feb 01, 2007 11:45 pm |
|
|
|
| LiBsTeR wrote: | | Vladimir Repnin-Volkonsky wrote: | I'd still like to know what this "spinster" is doing in high school at that age
As a practical matter, while laws in most states mandate school attendance at least until graduation or age 16, many require attendance until age 17 or 18. (However, enforcement of truancy laws is sporadic.) Conversely, students who have failed a grade may remain in high school past the age of 18. In general, students over 18 attend alternative classes to receive a GED. State laws vary on the cut-off age for students to receive free public education services. Many states have adult high schools for people generally 19 and over.
Was she on the short bus programme at Mountain Brook perhaps?
Or were the truancy laws just that, too sporadic |
October 2, 1986 means she graduated high school at 18 and she is now 20 |
It does?
help my feeble mind, I can't grasp it.
3 June 2005, born 1986
2005
1986
------
19
Wouldn't October 2, 2005 mean she's turning 20? and now she's 21?
What am I missing?
|
|
** Banned **
Joined: 24 Oct 2006
Posts: 553
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| LiBsTeR
Posted:
Thu Feb 01, 2007 11:45 pm |
|
|
|
| WangChung wrote: | | Heli wrote: | Ruth McVay, Lee Ashford Broughton, Mary Lassiter Wood
New Year, 2007
|
Saggy breasts, big hips and the smiles of the Redneck Wealthy. Yee Haw!! |
i dont know who the one on the right is but the one in the middle is really pretty. ruth is on left?
|
|
Joined: 11 Jan 2007
Posts: 380
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| statinmyopinion2
Posted:
Thu Feb 01, 2007 11:46 pm |
|
|
|
Were these "children" just allowed to give statements..without any follow up questions?
Seems to me that is all these 302's show. Statements.
No where do I see the FBI questions to these "children".
Something like: Did you see Natalee back at the hotel after 2am...
What was her state of mind like?
Did she ever state she wanted to run away?
Did she talk to you about her home life? Was she happy? Sad? Depressed?
Did she ever mention someone she liked?
Did she ever mention trouble with anyone?
Did she do drugs?
Nothing. No where do I see where Lee, or like the others' EVER asked any questions. Just gave a statement on what THEY did that last night.
|
|
HMI, we are still watching you!
Joined: 25 Mar 2006
Posts: 2308
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Heli
Posted:
Thu Feb 01, 2007 11:48 pm |
|
|
|
She'll be 21 in October, 2007
In May, 2005 she was 18
DOB: October 2, 1986
|
|
Transcription Goddess
Joined: 23 Mar 2006
Posts: 24630
Location: Puffed Up DimWit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| tulsad
Posted:
Thu Feb 01, 2007 11:49 pm |
|
|
|
| Vladimir Repnin-Volkonsky wrote: |
It does?
help my feeble mind, I can't grasp it.
3 June 2005, born 1986
2005
1986
------
19
Wouldn't October 2, 2005 mean she's turning 20? and now she's 21?
What am I missing? |
She was born in Oct. 1986, so she turned 20 in Oct. 2006. Go back to 2004, she turned 18 - so she was 18 when she graduated in June 2005.
|
|
Sparkly Tree
Joined: 19 Aug 2006
Posts: 10338
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| LiBsTeR
Posted:
Thu Feb 01, 2007 11:50 pm |
|
|
|
| Vladimir Repnin-Volkonsky wrote: | | LiBsTeR wrote: | | Vladimir Repnin-Volkonsky wrote: | I'd still like to know what this "spinster" is doing in high school at that age
As a practical matter, while laws in most states mandate school attendance at least until graduation or age 16, many require attendance until age 17 or 18. (However, enforcement of truancy laws is sporadic.) Conversely, students who have failed a grade may remain in high school past the age of 18. In general, students over 18 attend alternative classes to receive a GED. State laws vary on the cut-off age for students to receive free public education services. Many states have adult high schools for people generally 19 and over.
Was she on the short bus programme at Mountain Brook perhaps?
Or were the truancy laws just that, too sporadic |
October 2, 1986 means she graduated high school at 18 and she is now 20 |
It does?
help my feeble mind, I can't grasp it.
3 June 2005, born 1986
2005
1986
------
19
Wouldn't October 2, 2005 mean she's turning 20? and now she's 21?
What am I missing? |
Her birthday is october 2 1986 according to that paper. that means she was 18 almost her whole senior year and also at the time of the statements and the trip and she is 20 now and will be 21 this coming october. why is this hard? natalees bithday=october (day?) 1986 and she was 18 at the time of the trip and would be 20 now.
|
|
Joined: 11 Jan 2007
Posts: 380
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Vladimir Repnin-Volkonsky
Posted:
Thu Feb 01, 2007 11:51 pm |
|
|
|
| Heli wrote: | She'll be 21 in October, 2007
In May, 2005 she was 18
DOB: October 2, 1986 |
Again I must confess, I am lost. Thank you dear, if you say it is, then it is.
I bumped my head pruning the other day
|
|
** Banned **
Joined: 24 Oct 2006
Posts: 553
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
