| A must read Edit: RU cited as a site to go to in it - Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4 |
| View previous topic
:: View next topic |
all10suspects
 Posted:
Mon Feb 12, 2007 8:08 pm |
|
|
|
| dugo wrote: | | iwabwu wrote: |
I believe evidence that she is deceased due to the fact that she has not been seen or heard from since getting into the Kalpoe vehicle with J2K. What evidence suggests she left that car alive?
|
Nobody ever died from not not being seen. The owner/driver, the brother of the owner/driver and the friend of the owner/driver of the car all declare she left the car alive, nothing suggests she didn't, JMNSHO.
|
Yes but the owner/driver, the brother of the owner/driver and the
friend of the owner /driver of the car have lied form the start of this case. We have no reason to believe they are telling the truth now.
As an example of not telling the truth to this day is Joran says its Satish that drove him home and Deepak and Satish saying they did not and he walk home. Thier is no proof of them telling the truth after Natalee got in the car. Deepak and Satish say they went to the lighthouse and the beach. Joran say sthey went to his apartment and the beach. Just becuase they declare it does not mean it true. They are just protecting themselves so the ALE will not find out what happen to Natalee. IMO.
|
|
Joined: 20 Jul 2006
Posts: 6357
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
| dugo
Posted:
Mon Feb 12, 2007 8:13 pm |
|
|
|
| all10suspects wrote: | | dugo wrote: | | iwabwu wrote: |
I believe evidence that she is deceased due to the fact that she has not been seen or heard from since getting into the Kalpoe vehicle with J2K. What evidence suggests she left that car alive?
|
Nobody ever died from not not being seen. The owner/driver, the brother of the owner/driver and the friend of the owner/driver of the car all declare she left the car alive, nothing suggests she didn't, JMNSHO.
|
Yes but the owner/driver, the brother of the owner/driver and the
friend of the owner /driver of the car have lied form the start of this case. We have no reason to believe they are telling the truth now.
As an example of not telling the truth to this day is Joran says its Satish that drove him home and Deepak and Satish saying they did not and he walk home. Thier is no proof of them telling the truth after Natalee got in the car. Deepak and Satish say they went to the lighthouse and the beach. Joran say sthey went to his apartment and the beach. Just becuase they declare it does not mean it true. They are just protecting themselves so the ALE will not find out what happen to Natalee. IMO. |
...she left the car alive, nothing suggests she didn't, JMNSHO, and I leave it at that.
|
|
Dashing Dutch Dynamo Dude
Joined: 12 Apr 2006
Posts: 6808
Location: verwegistan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| apodixis
Posted:
Tue Feb 13, 2007 1:11 pm |
|
|
|
iwabwu Sun Feb 11, 2007 7:01 pm above asks: “How could someone estimate a blood alcohol content for a missing person without a body? A blood test? “
By knowing from witness’ statements the number of drinks consumed , the alcohol composition of them, the body weight of the drinker, and the time since consumption. As Dragnet’s Sgt. Joe Friday used to say “Just the facts maam, please.”
For more facts refer to the website which is the topic of this thread, page 7, titled “Just concentrate on the facts Watson”: http://member.telpacific.com.au/rolyroper/NataleeHolloway/page07.htm
|
|
Joined: 06 Aug 2006
Posts: 5138
Location: State of Jefferson, Ecotopia
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| frrp
Posted:
Tue Feb 13, 2007 1:19 pm |
|
|
|
wabwu is like a tik tock tik tock it never gives answers . it nag and nag and nag and nag , it is a pain of walking barefooted in the snow.Put some shoes on woman, an give at least ME some peace .
|
|
Joined: 24 Mar 2006
Posts: 1710
Location: NORGE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| iwabwu
Posted:
Tue Feb 13, 2007 6:52 pm |
|
|
|
| dugo wrote: | | all10suspects wrote: | Yes but the owner/driver, the brother of the owner/driver and the
friend of the owner /driver of the car have lied form the start of this case. We have no reason to believe they are telling the truth now.
As an example of not telling the truth to this day is Joran says its Satish that drove him home and Deepak and Satish saying they did not and he walk home. Thier is no proof of them telling the truth after Natalee got in the car. Deepak and Satish say they went to the lighthouse and the beach. Joran say sthey went to his apartment and the beach. Just becuase they declare it does not mean it true. They are just protecting themselves so the ALE will not find out what happen to Natalee. IMO. |
...she left the car alive, nothing suggests she didn't, JMNSHO, and I leave it at that. |
Where is the hard evidence that she left the car alive? Is there a video or recording somewhere? A witness other than J2K?
A beach bum? A fisherman? A couple at the beach? A security guard?
Just wondering.
|
|
** Banned **
Joined: 17 May 2006
Posts: 6314
Location: Third Rock From The Sun
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| tulsad
Posted:
Tue Feb 13, 2007 6:57 pm |
|
|
|
| iwabwu wrote: | | dugo wrote: | | all10suspects wrote: | Yes but the owner/driver, the brother of the owner/driver and the
friend of the owner /driver of the car have lied form the start of this case. We have no reason to believe they are telling the truth now.
As an example of not telling the truth to this day is Joran says its Satish that drove him home and Deepak and Satish saying they did not and he walk home. Thier is no proof of them telling the truth after Natalee got in the car. Deepak and Satish say they went to the lighthouse and the beach. Joran say sthey went to his apartment and the beach. Just becuase they declare it does not mean it true. They are just protecting themselves so the ALE will not find out what happen to Natalee. IMO. |
...she left the car alive, nothing suggests she didn't, JMNSHO, and I leave it at that. |
Where is the hard evidence that she left the car alive? Is there a video or recording somewhere? A witness other than J2K?
A beach bum? A fisherman? A couple at the beach? A security guard?
Just wondering. |
Much more importantly - there is no evidence that she did not leave the car alive. It goes back to you cannot prove a negative, Wabbi.
|
|
Sparkly Tree
Joined: 19 Aug 2006
Posts: 10338
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| iwabwu
Posted:
Tue Feb 13, 2007 8:05 pm |
|
|
|
| tulsad wrote: | | Much more importantly - there is no evidence that she did not leave the car alive. It goes back to you cannot prove a negative, Wabbi. |
IMHO, that leaves J2K with the opportunity to tell the truth of what they did that night, and where they left Natalee.
|
|
** Banned **
Joined: 17 May 2006
Posts: 6314
Location: Third Rock From The Sun
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| dugo
Posted:
Wed Feb 14, 2007 10:32 am |
|
|
|
| iwabwu wrote: | | tulsad wrote: | | Much more importantly - there is no evidence that she did not leave the car alive. It goes back to you cannot prove a negative, Wabbi. |
IMHO, that leaves J2K with the opportunity to tell the truth of what they did that night, and where they left Natalee. |
And then what!? Look if she is still there?
|
|
Dashing Dutch Dynamo Dude
Joined: 12 Apr 2006
Posts: 6808
Location: verwegistan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| yankee-in-france
Posted:
Wed Feb 14, 2007 10:47 am |
|
|
|
Here we go explaining the laws of relativity and negativity again! 
|
|
YIF
Joined: 30 Mar 2006
Posts: 10440
Location: France
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| tulsad
Posted:
Wed Feb 14, 2007 11:36 am |
|
|
|
| yankee-in-france wrote: | | Here we go explaining the laws of relativity and negativity again! |
|
|
Sparkly Tree
Joined: 19 Aug 2006
Posts: 10338
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Siddalee
Posted:
Wed Feb 14, 2007 1:17 pm |
|
|
|
| yankee-in-france wrote: | | Here we go explaining the laws of relativity and negativity again! |
Nope, sounds like a major comprehension glitch to me:
What is comprehension?
Definition
Comprehension is the ability to grasp something mentally and the capacity to understand ideas and facts.
|
|
Ya-Ya!
Joined: 23 Mar 2006
Posts: 7865
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| apodixis
Posted:
Wed Feb 14, 2007 1:31 pm |
|
|
|
I don’t think there is sufficient comprehension here of Wabbi’s lovely sense of humor.
And that avatar alone is reason enough to appreciate her posting here.
|
|
Joined: 06 Aug 2006
Posts: 5138
Location: State of Jefferson, Ecotopia
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| tulsad
Posted:
Wed Feb 14, 2007 1:56 pm |
|
|
|
| apodixis wrote: | I don’t think there is sufficient comprehension here of Wabbi’s lovely sense of humor.
And that avatar alone is reason enough to appreciate her posting here. |
You are absolutely right, Apodixis; Wabbi posses a very dry wit which is often hidden. She's also good-natured; how many people would realize that much of what is said to her is simply teasing?
Her incessant questions do drive me at times, though. 
|
|
Sparkly Tree
Joined: 19 Aug 2006
Posts: 10338
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| apodixis
Posted:
Wed Feb 14, 2007 2:14 pm |
|
|
|
RU needs to add sarcasm, irony and droll or dry humor emoticons.
I saw an animated red Dripping sarcasm emoticon on another website, but have not located its source.
Has anyone else seen that and knows how to obtain it ?
|
|
Joined: 06 Aug 2006
Posts: 5138
Location: State of Jefferson, Ecotopia
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
