�
 |
|
 |
|
|
| Lawsuit Vs. CNN, Grace Goes to Court - |
| View previous topic
:: View next topic |
gwen
 Posted:
Thu Jun 21, 2007 7:00 am |
|
|
|
Lawsuit Vs. CNN, Grace Goes to Court
OCALA, Fla. (AP) -- A judge has ruled that a wrongful death lawsuit claiming that CNN's Nancy Grace pushed the mother of a missing toddler to suicide through aggressive questioning on her show will be tried in federal court.
U.S. Magistrate Judge Gary R. Jones ruled Monday that federal court would handle the lawsuit filed by Melinda Duckett's relatives because the involved parties are from different jurisdictions, according to court documents.
The lawsuit was filed in November 2006 and names the talk show host and CNN as defendants.
Grace grilled Duckett on Grace's CNN Headline News show in September 2006 about the disappearance of Duckett's 2-year-old son, Trenton. Duckett fatally shot herself before the network aired the pre-taped interview.
Authorities, who have said they believe Trenton is still alive, have named Melinda Duckett as the prime suspect in his disappearance.
Attorneys involved in the case did not return phone messages left at their offices Tuesday.
CNN is a division of Time Warner Inc.
http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/070620/missing_boy.html?.v=1
|
|
AKA Gagal_05
Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 14465
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
| charlierat
Posted:
Thu Jun 21, 2007 7:39 am |
|
|
|
This is probably a court win for CNN and Nasty Disgrace. I presume that the Duckett family originally filed their lawsuit in State Court and that CNN et al. removed it to Federal Court. This appears to be a denial of the Duckett's Motion to Remand the case back to State Court.
|
|
** Banned **
Joined: 24 Mar 2006
Posts: 6970
Location: If you don't know by now, don't mess with it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Sultan
Posted:
Thu Jun 21, 2007 7:44 am |
|
|
|
They will have a hard time winning in Federal court
|
|
Swinging the Ladies
Joined: 27 Mar 2006
Posts: 2353
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| spngbobthebldr
Posted:
Thu Jun 21, 2007 8:38 am |
|
|
|
| charlierat wrote: | | This is probably a court win for CNN and Nasty Disgrace. I presume that the Duckett family originally filed their lawsuit in State Court and that CNN et al. removed it to Federal Court. This appears to be a denial of the Duckett's Motion to Remand the case back to State Court. |
Nancy Grace's attorneys filed something requesting it be moved to Federal Court a few weeks after the Ducketts filed the original suit.
|
|
It ain't easy wearing square pants!
Joined: 24 Mar 2006
Posts: 2945
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| charlierat
Posted:
Thu Jun 21, 2007 8:45 am |
|
|
|
| spngbobthebldr wrote: | | charlierat wrote: | | This is probably a court win for CNN and Nasty Disgrace. I presume that the Duckett family originally filed their lawsuit in State Court and that CNN et al. removed it to Federal Court. This appears to be a denial of the Duckett's Motion to Remand the case back to State Court. |
Nancy Grace's attorneys filed something requesting it be moved to Federal Court a few weeks after the Ducketts filed the original suit. |
Yes. The procedure is known as "removal." If all of the defendants are from out-of-state and the plaintiffs are asking for more than $75,000 in the lawsuit, the case can be heard in Federal Court.
I agree with Sultan, too. Federal Court has two advantages. One is at the trial level. The jury is selected from the entire Federal district instead of just the local county in which the suit was filed (kind of negates "home cooking") and the other is, if they get a bad result at trial, they can appeal to the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals (which is based in Atlanta and is a notoriously conservative judicial body) as opposed to the appellate courts of the State of Florida.
|
|
** Banned **
Joined: 24 Mar 2006
Posts: 6970
Location: If you don't know by now, don't mess with it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| woebedamned
Posted:
Thu Jun 21, 2007 8:51 am |
|
|
|
| charlierat wrote: | | spngbobthebldr wrote: | | charlierat wrote: | | This is probably a court win for CNN and Nasty Disgrace. I presume that the Duckett family originally filed their lawsuit in State Court and that CNN et al. removed it to Federal Court. This appears to be a denial of the Duckett's Motion to Remand the case back to State Court. |
Nancy Grace's attorneys filed something requesting it be moved to Federal Court a few weeks after the Ducketts filed the original suit. |
Yes. The procedure is known as "removal." If all of the defendants are from out-of-state and the plaintiffs are asking for more than $75,000 in the lawsuit, the case can be heard in Federal Court.
I agree with Sultan, too. Federal Court has two advantages. One is at the trial level. The jury is selected from the entire Federal district instead of just the local county in which the suit was filed (kind of negates "home cooking") and the other is, if they get a bad result at trial, they can appeal to the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals (which is based in Atlanta and is a notoriously conservative judicial body) as opposed to the appellate courts of the State of Florida. |
I recall something in Nancy's past concerning the Atlanta courts, if I am not mistaken. I think it was something similiar to the Nifong stuff.
|
|
Damn it All!!!!
Joined: 15 Aug 2006
Posts: 6287
Location: pathetic joke of an American, bitter, gun clinging, God loving, racist cracker
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Hannie
Posted:
Thu Jun 21, 2007 8:53 am |
|
|
|
I do remember that also, woe...
|
|
li'l Shango's Mommy
Joined: 23 Mar 2006
Posts: 22087
Location: The Hague, The Netherlands
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| gwen
Posted:
Thu Jun 21, 2007 9:32 am |
|
|
|
11th Circuit: Nancy Grace 'Played Fast and Loose' With Ethics
Federal appeals court raps former prosecutor
Jonathan Ringel
Fulton County Daily Report
05-04-2005
Nancy Grace, the host of a self-titled legal show on CNN Headline News, "played fast and loose" with her ethical duties as a Fulton County, Ga., prosecutor in 1990, a federal appeals panel has declared.
Monday's decision by the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a triple murder conviction won by Grace, explaining that her actions didn't change the result of the trial. It is the third time appellate courts have admonished Grace for her conduct as a prosecutor in Georgia. Grace served as an assistant district attorney in Fulton from 1987 to 1996, leaving that year to join Court TV as a commentator.
The three-judge panel on Monday criticized Grace for not following her obligations to disclose to the defendant's lawyer information about other possible suspects. The 11th Circuit also agreed with a magistrate who found it hard to believe that Grace did not knowingly use a detective's false testimony that there were no other suspects.
"Despite the failure of the prosecutor to fulfill her responsibilities," wrote Judge William H. Pryor Jr., the Georgia courts were not unreasonable to have upheld the convictions of Herbert Connell Stephens.
A Fulton jury held Stephens responsible for the June 1990 murders of John Davis, Toria Pope and Tony Daniel at the Red Oaks housing project in Atlanta. Stephens was sentenced to three consecutive life sentences.
Grace on Tuesday denied hiding that other people might have been involved with the crime, noting one of her witnesses said so in open court.
"While some of the comments of the court are hurtful to me," she added, "I am thankful for the unanimous decision" keeping the verdict intact.
Stephens' lawyer, G. Terry Jackson of Savannah's Jackson & Schiavone, said he was disappointed with the ruling and would consider asking the full 11th Circuit or the U.S. Supreme Court to review the case.
"It's very clear Mr. Stephens did not receive a fair trial," said Jackson.
Stephens' original trial lawyer, Fulton public defender Kenneth D. Kondritzer, called the court's description of Grace as playing "fast and loose" with ethical rules "an understatement."
Stephen Gillers, a legal ethics professor from New York University School of Law, wrote in an e-mail that Grace's actions regarding the detective were serious, "because submitting false sworn testimony to a court is probably the gravest violation of legal ethics."
DEFENSE KEPT IN THE DARK
The major issue before the courts reviewing the Stephens case was the existence of arrest warrants for two other people suspected of the murders. Stephens' lawyers have said that information could have steered the jury to acquit Stephens.
One witness identified John Wesley Ragin and Travis Williams as having been at the scene of the crimes along with Stephens and four conspirators. The four conspirators pleaded guilty the day Stephens went to trial and were sentenced to 18 months in prison.
Arrest warrants were issued for Ragin and Williams, but they never were indicted, according to the Georgia Supreme Court's 1994 review of the case, which upheld Stephens' convictions.
Although Kondritzer did not find out about the warrants until after the trial, "there is no proof that the State deliberately concealed the existence of those warrants," wrote Justice George H. Carley for the unanimous court.
Carley also dismissed claims that police testimony saying there were no suspects other than Stephens was false as a result of the arrest warrants. The justice noted that the evidence underlying the arrest warrants was admitted at trial. Stephens v. State, 264 Ga. 761 (1994).
Stephens' habeas corpus challenges to the verdict failed at a state court and the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, with both citing statements from 10 witnesses who either saw Stephens shoot the victims or saw him at the scene.
The federal judges, however, showed they were troubled by Grace's actions. U.S. Magistrate E. Clayton Scofield III wrote in 2003 that the "overwhelming" evidence of Stephens' guilt made it unreasonable to think that false testimony indicating there were no other suspects would have made a difference.
Scofield added that he was not condoning Grace's actions, writing, "The prosecutor clearly played fast and loose with her disclosure obligations in this case." Stephens v. Hall, No. 1:99-CV-1317 (N.D.Ga. April 2, 2003).
Judge Charles A. Moye Jr. accepted Scofield's report, adding he "reluctantly finds that there was sufficient evidence" to support the state courts' conclusions. Stephens v. Hall, No. 1:99-CV-1317 (N.D.Ga. Sept. 11, 2003).
At the 11th Circuit, Pryor noted that the court was bound by rules requiring it to be "highly deferential" to state courts' rulings. He was joined by Judges Gerald B. Tjoflat and Joel F. Dubina.
Pryor pointed out that during testimony of the state habeas case, Grace denied that detectives provided her with the arrest warrants that were at the heart of Stephens' claims.
"Regardless," Pryor added, "it was Grace's duty to learn about the warrants and disclose them" to Stephens' lawyers. Pryor later said the court agreed with Scofield's belief that Grace "played fast and loose" with her ethical duties.
But the state courts were not unreasonable, Pryor concluded, to say that Grace's failures did not materially change the result of the trial. As a result, the panel rejected Stephens' arguments that Grace's actions constituted a violation of his due process rights. Stephens v. Hall, No. 03-15251 (11th Cir. May 2, 2005).
GRACE'S THIRD SCOLDING
This is the third time Grace's conduct as a prosecutor has been criticized by an appellate court.
In 1997, the Georgia Supreme Court skewered Grace for her actions in prosecuting Weldon Wayne Carr for allegedly setting fire to his house and murdering his wife. Carr later was freed when Fulton prosecutors waited too long to bring him up for a retrial. While the court reversed Carr's 1994 conviction for other reasons, the justices said Grace withheld evidence entitled to the defense and made improper opening statements and closing arguments.
"We conclude that the conduct of the prosecuting attorney in this case demonstrated her disregard of the notions of due process and fairness, and was inexcusable," wrote then Chief Justice Robert Benham. Carr v. State, 267 Ga. 701 (1997).
In 1994, the Georgia high court voted 6-1 to reverse a heroin trafficking conviction won by Grace because she "exceeded the wide latitude of closing argument" by referring to drug-related murders and serial rape, which were not at issue. Bell v. State, 263 Ga. 776 (1994).
Two calls and an e-mail to CNN officials seeking comment were not returned.
Asked whether her run-ins with appellate judges discredit her as a legal commentator, Grace noted that she tried more than 100 jury trials and handled thousands of guilty pleas in more than 10 years as a prosecutor.
"It's a lifetime of work," she said, noting that she decided to become a lawyer after her fiance was murdered.
Echoing the tone she frequently takes on her TV show, which often focuses on crime victims, Grace asserted that Stephens was responsible for murdering three young people.
"Who knows what they could have become today?" she asked.
http://www.law.com/article.jsp.htm
|
|
AKA Gagal_05
Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 14465
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Sultan
Posted:
Thu Jun 21, 2007 9:41 am |
|
|
|
| woebedamned wrote: | | charlierat wrote: | | spngbobthebldr wrote: | | charlierat wrote: | | This is probably a court win for CNN and Nasty Disgrace. I presume that the Duckett family originally filed their lawsuit in State Court and that CNN et al. removed it to Federal Court. This appears to be a denial of the Duckett's Motion to Remand the case back to State Court. |
Nancy Grace's attorneys filed something requesting it be moved to Federal Court a few weeks after the Ducketts filed the original suit. |
Yes. The procedure is known as "removal." If all of the defendants are from out-of-state and the plaintiffs are asking for more than $75,000 in the lawsuit, the case can be heard in Federal Court.
I agree with Sultan, too. Federal Court has two advantages. One is at the trial level. The jury is selected from the entire Federal district instead of just the local county in which the suit was filed (kind of negates "home cooking") and the other is, if they get a bad result at trial, they can appeal to the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals (which is based in Atlanta and is a notoriously conservative judicial body) as opposed to the appellate courts of the State of Florida. |
I recall something in Nancy's past concerning the Atlanta courts, if I am not mistaken. I think it was something similiar to the Nifong stuff. |
Yes, it seems she has some ethical problems when she was the prosecutor. Not turning over exculpatory evidence to the defense and some other issues.
She was reprimanded by the bar 2 or 3 times.
Sorry, Gwen, I did not see your post or should say read your post.
|
|
Swinging the Ladies
Joined: 27 Mar 2006
Posts: 2353
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| gwen
Posted:
Thu Jun 21, 2007 9:44 am |
|
|
|
Sultan, that's fine. I did not realize it was so long. Sorry!
|
|
AKA Gagal_05
Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 14465
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| resigned
Posted:
Sun Jun 24, 2007 1:27 pm |
|
|
|
Magistrate: Drop dad from Duckett suit
June 21, 2007
OCALA - A federal magistrate has recommended that the father of Trenton Duckett be dropped from a wrongful-death lawsuit accusing TV talk-show host Nancy Grace of pushing the missing boy's mother to suicide.
Magistrate Gary R. Jones concluded "there is no possibility" that Melinda Duckett's family can establish a claim in federal court against her estranged husband, Joshua Duckett. The family had sought a court-ordered accounting of the Trenton Duckett Family Charitable Trust, alleging Joshua had improperly used donations for personal use.
Jones also recommended that the lawsuit against Grace remain in federal court, siding with lawyers for Grace and the Atlanta-based Cable News Network, which airs the former prosecutor's crime program. Melinda Duckett's family had wanted the case to be heard in Circuit Court in Lake County.
The magistrate's recommendations will be submitted to U.S. District Judge William Terrell Hodges, who has final say.
(snipped)
http://www.orlandosentinel.com/community/news/leesburg/orl-lbriefs21_607jun21,0,6537784.story
|
|
Click your heels together...
Joined: 14 Aug 2006
Posts: 27592
Location: "Onboard" pathenry's desk
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
�
Jasidogdotcom template v.1.0.4 © jasidog.com
Powered by phpBB
© 2001, 2004 phpBB Group
|
