Shipper speaks ..

[cajun_mali]

Link?

"Young, hip, black guy" ... "undercover cop" ... ohhhh, what's the show ....


MOD SQUAD !!!!

[resigned]

"Young, hip, black guy" ... "undercover cop" ... ohhhh, what's the show ....


MOD SQUAD !!!!

That was Linc. Short for Lincoln (Hayes) played by Clarence Williams III.

Did you want to try again or leave well enough alone?

[cajun_mali]

That was Linc. Short for Lincoln (Hayes) played by Clarence Williams III.

Did you want to try again or leave well enough alone?

Where are you going with this? What am I Lincoln to?

[resigned]

Where are you going with this? What am I Lincoln to?

Sucks doesn't it.

[henk]

Seeing you didn't join til 2008, maybe you should start back in the archives and catch yourself up...lots and lots of theories thru the years...

Start way back in 2006 to catch yourself up.....ya might actually learn sumpthin'...

Seeing you did join in 2006, ya mean.. Bongo might actually learn sumpthin' from you?

Don't fall of your high horse, Pro..

[Bongo]

No- not at all. Catch phrases from tv shows doesn't mean crap regarding the case.





Vicky Pollard


Vicky Pollard is your common-or-garden teenage delinquent, the sort you can see hanging around any number of off licences in Britain, trying to persuade people going inside to buy them 10 fags and a bottle of White Lightening.
Whether nicking stuff from the supermarket or swapping her baby for a Westlife CD, Vicky reacts to any accusation with indignant outrage, while filling you in on 'this fing wot you know nuffin about'.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/comedy/littlebrita ... icky.shtml

It is I, Bongo, who adopted the phrase. An I think it fits quit perfect referring to most (not to say all) of Mr. 'Resigned's phrases..

[Bongo]

Seeing you didn't join til 2008, maybe you should start back in the archives and catch yourself up...lots and lots of theories thru the years...

Start way back in 2006 to catch yourself up.....ya might actually learn sumpthin'...

No but yeah but no but yeah but no but yeah no but yeah but no because
this is I wot you know nuffin about..

[resigned]

It is I, Bongo, who adopted the phrase. An I think it fits quit perfect referring to most (not to say all) of Mr. 'Resigned's phrases..

Seems a little personal - perhaps you should address me in HE instead of the case discussion forum.

[cajun_mali]

Sucks doesn't it.

no, you do

[prolific]

Seeing you did join in 2006, ya mean.. Bongo might actually learn sumpthin' from you?

Don't fall of your high horse, Pro..

I never said learn from 'me' now did I henk...nope, no I didn't nor did I even imply it...

But seeing how you just joined in 2008 as well and must not have ever read the archives you would have certainly missed that 'ALL' of the posts on this board and 'ALL' of the posts in the archives started in 2006...

http://www.refugeesunleashed.net/viewfo ... start=2300

[Bongo]

Seems a little personal - perhaps you should address me in HE instead of the case discussion forum.

this is funny, Bongo just popping in once in a while- inviting her almost immediately to address you in the HE? Despite her serious translation disability? You're funny.

btw, ruling a board 24 hours/ day the way you do does include 'little' personal aspects too.. Never noticed?
Having said that, bye-bye resigned! See you around!

[henk]

I never said learn from 'me' now did I henk...nope, no I didn't nor did I even imply it...

But seeing how you just joined in 2008 as well and must not have ever read the archives you would have certainly missed that 'ALL' of the posts on this board and 'ALL' of the posts in the archives started in 2006...

http://www.refugeesunleashed.net/viewfo ... start=2300

And I never said you did.. Did you miss the ?

What I read from your quote "But seeing how you just joined in 2008", you are implying Bongo and myself know nothing about threads/archives before 2008.. and you do..

And from your quote "ya might actually learn sumpthin'". you are implying, you know it all and we don't.. How arrogant..

prolific schreef:

Seeing you didn't join til 2008, maybe you should start back in the archives and catch yourself up...lots and lots of theories thru the years...

Start way back in 2006 to catch yourself up.....ya might actually learn sumpthin'...

[prolific]

Last quote does not exists!

high horse...arrogant...oh my...

Do you think that because you added a ? means that your implication wasn't still there henk? Oh dear, what arrogance!

Let's recap...when someone posts: connected to your one and only NBJ theory. it most certainly would indicate that one hasn't read the archives where there have been lots of theories up to today...hence my response...and then your parachuting in.

About arrogance and falling off that high horse henk...pot/kettle

[Fashionista]

<center>


Take "IT" to the Heated Exchange




.

[Knipoog]

<center>


Take "IT" to the Heated Exchange




.

The captain has spoken.

[iquitos]

[cajun_mali]

Hardly any evidence is not ~ no evidence.

In my neck of the USA, it usually means just that. Not an iota. Repeat this 3 times.

There is no evidence .. and it sucks ...

[K_Meine]

In my neck of the USA, it usually means just that. Not an iota. Repeat this 3 times.

There is no evidence .. and it sucks ...

umm, wouldn't Natalee's body be considered some sort of evidence? Simply because it was never found and likely never will be doesn't mean she never existed. IMHO the perpetrator(s) of Natalee's disappearance knew full well that getting rid of her body was crucial to their evading justice. No body, No evidence, No Case, Know freedom.

AFAIC had Paulus been employed in a field that didn't require legal knowledge this case could well have turned out differently. Once again, knowledge is king.

[WordsofWisdom]

umm, wouldn't Natalee's body be considered some sort of evidence? Simply because it was never found and likely never will be doesn't mean she never existed. IMHO the perpetrator(s) of Natalee's disappearance knew full well that getting rid of her body was crucial to their evading justice. No body, No evidence, No Case, Know freedom.

Yep.
But we disagree on just who those perps are.
AND we also disagree on whether or not it's a "body" or a live person that needs to be found.

But at least we agree that any perpetrators of a crime should be brought to justice.

[WordsofWisdom]

AFAIC had Paulus been employed in a field that didn't require legal knowledge this case could well have turned out differently. Once again, knowledge is king.

Paulus is not a suspect, your agenda is showing- again.

[prolific]

umm, wouldn't Natalee's body be considered some sort of evidence? Simply because it was never found and likely never will be doesn't mean she never existed. IMHO the perpetrator(s) of Natalee's disappearance knew full well that getting rid of her body was crucial to their evading justice. No body, No evidence, No Case, Know freedom.

AFAIC had Paulus been employed in a field that didn't require legal knowledge this case could well have turned out differently. Once again, knowledge is king.

I agree with you KM......knowing the system and how it works and being a part of it certainly can work in ones favor, also a coverup certainly doesn't mean that it would involve an entire police force or government, all it can take is one or two to turn their heads, you wash my back I'll wash yours, knowing how to pull a few strings, call in a favor or two......Ben Vocking for one comes to mind....just enough in those first few days that the case would become unsolveable.

[cajun_mali]

Well ... what body? Is it still alive or dead? A body would be part of a body of evidence. Since there is no body, then it's not part of the body of evidence. It's not a matter of "existence" somewhere, but being found and used as evidence.

There doesn't seem to be a body of circumstantial evidence, though there have been attempts to manufacture some.

So, you're agreeing there is no evidence!

I'd love evidence, simply because it would give resolution one way or another.

umm, wouldn't Natalee's body be considered some sort of evidence? Simply because it was never found and likely never will be doesn't mean she never existed. IMHO the perpetrator(s) of Natalee's disappearance knew full well that getting rid of her body was crucial to their evading justice. No body, No evidence, No Case, Know freedom.

AFAIC had Paulus been employed in a field that didn't require legal knowledge this case could well have turned out differently. Once again, knowledge is king.

[AlwaysL8]

Well ... what body? Is it still alive or dead? A body would be part of a body of evidence. Since there is no body, then it's not part of the body of evidence. It's not a matter of "existence" somewhere, but being found and used as evidence.

There doesn't seem to be a body of circumstantial evidence, though there have been attempts to manufacture some.

So, you're agreeing there is no evidence!

I'd love evidence, simply because it would give resolution one way or another.

Per joran:

I got lucky....the ocean is big...

[sarge]

Joran even talked about 2 policemen who were paid to look the other way in his conversation with Greta. Joran lies but liars always tell some truth part of the time.

[K_Meine]

Yep.
But we disagree on just who those perps are.
AND we also disagree on whether or not it's a "body" or a live person that needs to be found.

But at least we agree that any perpetrators of a crime should be brought to justice.

And I don't mind being disagreed with. I must admit I find your optimism quite refreshing. There aren't many, including myself, who thinks there is even a remote chance that Natalee is alive somewhere. AFAIC it is possible but highly unlikely.

It would be nice if truth and justice prevailed and served there purpose.