iquitos wrote:maybe signed but are they authentic? still no word from the posters on procedence. these belong in the hands of a comptent journalist who can thoroughly anaylze them not on some biased blog. if they are actual case documents the case is thoroughly blown. not that they incriminate themselves but note joran probably admitted the fisherman's huts in the first interview so they already knew he might be lying about HI. Very interesting indeed.
The only thing I have made up my mind about is that there is something not quite right in the Holloway/Twitty camp. I like to explre all ideas, so having said that:
If releasing "official" documents damages any chance of bringing criminal proceedings against J2K-why would anyone think the H/T family would be the ones releasing them? Makes more sense if it came from the J2K side.
I think this because I believe Beth's mission is to damage Joran and his family in a way that can not be proven. She wants this to stir a debate. She says it proves he is a liar, which therefore makes him a rapist, kidnapper, and murderer.
i honestly don't think she thinks before she acts, which is what began this entire mess. I do not believe she stopped and thought it might jeopardize her credibility... She'll just say she knows Natalee and that Natalee did not consent to these things, etc. and play out the grieving momma drama.
On the other hand, someone a little more indirect like a certain PI... could have thrown these out like leftovers to a dog... just trying to trigger a response. If Beth and her clan's MO was to find Natalee, there wouldn't be this hooplah in the first place. If her goal was to find Natalee, it wouldn't make any sense. I think she prides herself on being the aggressor behind closed doors while starring on the sympathy channels to all who will listen. JMO.