resigned wrote:
Until proof is shown - it fits the same category. Just something printed or heard that may or may not be true.
No, not if you consider the source. It was an interview b.t.w.
Even some kind of a reason was given.
Moderator: Fashionista
resigned wrote:
Until proof is shown - it fits the same category. Just something printed or heard that may or may not be true.
Knipoog wrote:
No, not if you consider the source. It was an interview b.t.w.
Even some kind of a reason was given.
iquitos wrote:island sources and Dutch newspapers reported van der sloot had not made the cut for judge before his son became the target of the Natalee holloway investigation. Mr. Vocking was not employed in the judiciary and his personal friendship with the van der Sloot family appeared to have no effect on the vigor with which the prosecution and the police pursued the prosecution of Joran van der Sloot aver which as an administrative support person at the PG he did not likely have much influence.
Reporter (Twan Huys): Which function do you have here at the island? Because many stories go around about that. What is your function?
Paul van der Sloot: I am a replacing member of the joint court of justice of the Netherlands Antilles and Aruba [1] and I am appointed for a period of three years, from January the first, 2003, until January the first, 2006.
Reporter (Twan Huys): So, you are replacement judge?
Paul van der Sloot: Yes.
Quote:
Paul van der Sloot: That is completely incorrect. The moment it became clear that Joran was going to be involved in this case in one way or another, I asked for leave and I have not been at the court anymore. That is, to make very clear, most of all, I am now a father and not a judge.
Reporter (Twan Huys): Because you realized that else these stories would be brought into the world?
Paul van der Sloot: In this situation you have to avoid every appearance [of impropriety].
Reporter : Do you know the people very well, for example, the people here from the public prosecutors' office that ordered your detention?
Paul van der Sloot: Yes, for sure, because, before that, I have worked for eight years as chief of the cabinet of the prosecutor general
Reporter : So, you also know the current prosecutor general?
Paul van der Sloot: Yes.
Reporter: Mrs. Croes.
resigned wrote:
I would enjoy seeing or hearing it at some point and Judge for myself....regardless of the outcome ofwhen he may or may not have beed told it wasn't going to work out. I still thinkhe was well-connected
The man worked for the Aruban Govt. for 8 years and then as Private Secretary to the Attorney General before he began to climb up a few more rungs. He knew people, he lived on Aruba for quite a number of years, he knew the fellow judges and the members of the OM and quite certainly some of the LE investigators. It makes a difference. People aren't a chest o drawers where everything is compartmentalized. JMO
Knipoog wrote:
You need to do more abstract thinking.
Leave the absolute thinking to other posters.![]()
You are really wrong about this.
So you have already three strikes.
Get out of my cab.![]()
resigned wrote:Last quote does not exists!
iquitos wrote:connected you are. paulus obviously came up short. his house was searched, his cars were confiscated, his son was thrown in the slammer for the maximum period allowed, he spent a couple nights in the slammer himself, his "friends" at the high court in curacao denied his false arrest compensation after his "friends" at the om appealed his lower court victory. then nico jorg ripped him a new one in a public dressing down. the only palpable sign he had any connections came in the form of a visit from the discredited and outcast ben vocking. Paulus could have been a passive aggressive stickler and hair splitter who rubbed more than a few the wrong way.
he was probably blacked balled by his peers in the judiciary when it came to his becoming a full judge.
Knipoog wrote:Last quote does not exists!
resigned wrote:He was slapped on the wrist, passed the Aruban bar exam and moved into private practice with his wayward son's attorney.
That's being connected.
resigned wrote:
With all due respect - I don't need to let go of anything. This is just a discussion - I think Paulus's influence (which he was an imember of the government for years, hence- he had influence) did play a part in how the case was handled - whether it would ever be proven remains to be seen. I don't believe iquitos or you know exactly what transpired in Paulus's life up to and including the May 30, 2005 or as the events transpired afterward You can post what you have heard and believe and I will do the same. Thank you.
resigned wrote:He was slapped on the wrist, passed the Aruban bar exam and moved into private practice with his wayward son's attorney.
That's being connected.
iquitos wrote:
slapped on the wrist for what?
resigned wrote:
So -the rest of the Judiary took it out on Paulus by not awarding him compensation - basically accusing them of cronyism amongst themselves -that is, if there truly was no basis for the arrest - but yet Paulus wasn't like that - he was the only good guy and they didn't want him on board.
Not buying that either. He got a slap on the wrist and a bar license.
Emily wrote:
On what grounds could they refuse to give him one?
resigned wrote:Last quote does not exists!
Emily wrote:
You made it sound like his getting a license was a compensation prize from the authorities. Are you not claiming there was anything suspicious about him getting his license, that he had every right to get one if that's what he wanted and there was nothing corrupt in them giving him one?
PufPuf93 wrote:but has a strategic location and attractiveness.
The level of corruption on Aruba is minimal compared with financial, criminal, and political corruption in the USA that claims to be a Nation of fair laws and justice. The Netherlands and USA make and distort Aruba.
There is far too much violence and lack of brotherhood and combined-self interest in the western hemisphere. History and inertia make me sad. Neo-liberals and neo-conservatives have convergent interests in concentrating income, wealth, and hard assets to the detriment of most of us.
Return to Natalee Holloway Case Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests