Transcript: Don Imus/Joe Tacopina, April 19

Natalee Holloway Case Photos, transcripts

Moderator: Fashionista

Transcript: Don Imus/Joe Tacopina, April 19

Postby JesseLee » Wed Apr 19, 2006 5:05 pm

Transcript: Don Imus/Joe Tacopina -- April 19

I've now had a chance to view my DVR and have transcribed this morning's interview of Joe Tacopina by Don Imus. (Imus is heard by millions of radio listeners and viewed on MSNBC.) I thought this was a particularly good interview and wanted those of you who missed it to be able to read it, especially Joran. Go Joe!


Imus in the Morning program, April 19, 2006 (broadcast from NY)

Don Imus telephone interview with Joe Tacopina (8:30 am)

Not verbatim. Not complete.

Don: Please welcome now to the program, our old friend, defense attorney, Joe Tacopina. Good morning, Joe.

Joe: Good morning, guys.

Don: How are you?

Joe: Good, how are you?

Don: So, don't you represent somebody in this Natalee Holloway deal?

Joe: Yeah, I represent the kid who's been dragged through the mud for the last 11 months, Joran v/d Sloot and his family.

Don: Aren't they the people Bo Dietl got in a fist fight with or something?

[laughter]

Joe: I knew I was on the right side of the case when I saw a video of Bo shoving a summons of complaint down my client's shirt when he got off the plane. Yeah, that's the one.

Don: Well, what was that all about?

Joe: That was about them filing their lawsuit in NY. We have this great lawsuit that's been filed by the Holloway family in NY against Joran and his Dad, over what they call a conflict that occurred in Aruba, charging Alabama law. And, I guess they think NY taxpayers should fund this one. So they want to try it in NY. But we moved to dismiss that. Bo is the process server who served Joran when he got off a plane in NYC.

Don: Why weren't you there, defending your client? Punch Bo in the mouth, when he tries to shove this thing.

Joe: Thanks to Bo's work, I was retained a day later.

Don: Oh, you were?

Joe: Yeah, that's when they hired me.

Don: So this kid didn't kill her?

Joe: Imus, let me tell you something, they contacted me a week before I decided to sign on board. The reason I didn't agree right away because this is not just a case where you go into court and defend someone pursuant to the constitution and canons of ethics. You aren't the judge for the execution as a defense lawyer. For the most part, it's not really a relevant factor if he's guilty or not. You're supposed to defend within the confines of the constitution. But in this case, it's more than just defending Joran in court. To defend him properly, you had to go out there and sort of prove his innocence. And, make statements like I've been making. I'm certain he had nothing to do with her disappearance. But before I did that, I didn't want to look like a total idiot. You know how hard that is for me to do.

[laughter]

I figured I'd try and do a little investigation first and make a determination. A week later, I came back to the v/d Sloot family and I said that I had absolutely no problem in representing him. And, I am certain he's going to be cleared. And I think that within the recent days, that the evidence has unfolded, that's going to start peeling away this investigation from Joran.

Don: I haven't followed this as closely as apparently everybody else has, because, I don't know why. I don't know.

Joe: I had not either. I'll be honest with you. It's not really a local story or anything. But I'll tell you, there's a sub-culture of people out there who watch the cable news shows at night.

Don: Oh I know.

Joe: Honest to God, I get maybe 75 emails a day on this case from people who watch -- who love this kid and feel bad for his family; and those who hate this kid and despite any lack of facts to support their conclusions, they think he's a murderer. And then, I get people who have solved the case. It's unbelievable. It's like the Da Vinci code, this thing. It's almost like it's become an obsession with some people -- to try and find out what happened.

Don: Here's what little I know about it, and then you can tell me if I'm wrong. But did he have any contact with the Holloway girl at that nightclub on that night she disappeared?

Joe: Oh absolutely.

Don: Oh he did?

Joe: Oh sure, sure. He left her on the beach about 2:40 am in the morning.

Don: He left her dead on the beach?

Joe: No, she was quite alive. A little intoxicated, but quite alive. And this kid, Joran, has phone records to back up his phone call to his friend to come and pick him up at about 2:40 am.

Don: Why did he leave her on the beach?

Joe: Why? Or, when?

Don: Was he hosing her on the beach or what?

Joe: Let me do this thing in a condensed explanation. He meets her at a bar. They leave. Joran's a nice kid; an attractive kid. They leave the bar with two of their friends and they get dropped off at a beach near her hotel. Not too far from her hotel.

Don: How many of them in the party?

Joe: It wasn't a party. It was a bar they were at.

Don: No, how many people were dropped off at the beach, you moron.

Joe: Oh, no, just Joran and Natalee.

Don: Oh, okay.

Joe: Joran's two friends dropped him off at the beach. He walked with Natalee.

Don: Hang on one second. What, Charles?

Charles: [Don Imus' sidekick] Don't cross-question the lawyer in this case, for crying out loud. And there's no necessity -- you merely misunderstood what you were referring to as party. Had they been in the bar or were you referring to the party of apparently four people.

Don: Yeah.

Charles: That's a very logical thing for him to have misinterpreted you, thinking you were referring to the bar they had just left. Don't call this man a moron!

Joe: Thank you Charles. Did you get the bottle of wine I sent you yesterday?

[laughter]

Charles: Yes, I did Joe. Thank you.

Don: So Joran and Natalee, there's just the two of them that got dropped off by somebody? What? These other two little squirrelly-looking guys? They dropped these two little rug merchants -- the two little rug merchants drop Natalee and Joran off at the beach, right?

Joe: That's right.

Don: Near the hotel.

Joe: Near the high rise hotels. They walk toward the fishermen's huts and they're on the beach for about a half hour. Joran, who's been an honor student all his life, had a final exam the next morning and about 2:45 am, told Natalee he had to go. It's time for them to take her back to the hotel. He had to go. And she didn't want to leave. She said, I'm staying here, I don't want to go. Stay with me tonight. Stay on the beach. And this is where he makes the mistake that he says he'll regret the rest of his life. He then called his friend at 2:40 am. His records back it up, Imus. And he says, this girl wants me to stay on the beach. I'm not staying. I have a test at 8:30 am. Which, he did. That's verified. He went to the test. He got 98 on this test, by the way. He took the test and passed it.

He then gets a ride home and he's on his own computer, with his own password, at about 3:10 am. So the computer and phone records back up his story. That's his story. He has an alibi that shows he didn't have enough time to kill and dispose of a body.

Don: When he calls, and made the telephone call to some friend of his, who was that friend, and what did the friend do?

Joe: That was the same kid who dropped him off; one of the Kalpoe brothers.

Don: Okay, then did they come down to stay with Natalee, or what?

Joe: No. One of the brothers came back and picked up Joran.

Don: Oh, I see.

Joe: At a spot down the beach a little bit. And Natalee? Joran left her there.

Don: On the beach?

Joe: On the beach. She was certainly drunk. She certainly looked like she was. You know, borrowing a phrase from the plaintiff's complaint, fading in and out of consciousness. And he left her there.

Don: Drunk on the beach?

Joe: Drunk on the beach.

Don: What a charming young man you're representing here.

Joe: Well, you know what? Listen. He's a 17-year-old boy at the time. And I'll tell you, he's been through hell and back. He regrets that he did that.

Don: Well what? That he's 17? He can't make a judgment? I was 17 in the Marine Corps.

Joe: Well that's a scary thought.

Don: Well, no, but I'm just saying that's a lame excuse. That he's 17 years old and can't make a judgment about someone who is in and out of consciousness, drunk on the beach.

Joe: That's not an excuse. It's a mistake. And he admits that mistake. But he has obviously no legal obligation. It doesn't make him a murderer. He hates that happened. But the long story short is that he leaves her on the beach. He goes home. He's on his computer. She says she's going to walk back. And that's the end of it. We don't hear anything else until the next day when her family arrives and approaches them in a very aggressive manner. But listen, interestingly, the people -- the guy who was just arrested, and there are two more people who are about to be arrested, are all members of this beach patrol.

Don: Right.

Joe: The beach patrol are basically the people who are supposed to be patrolling that beach, 24/7.

Don: Oh, I see.

Joe: So you understand where this may be going?

Don: Yeah.

Joe: So, his story has been corroborated. And the kid they have in custody now -- the judge just agreed that the prosecution met her heavy burden in holding him for another eight days. Because, they've obviously put forth some evidence that he has some involvement in her disappearance.

Don: I'm talking with Joe Tacopina, the defense lawyer who's representing Joran v/d Sloot, or whatever his name is. Yeah. In this Natalee Holloway mess. What do you think happened to her? What do you think?

Joe: Well, I know what I think. But, you know…

Don: What do you think?

Joe: Let me say this. Let me just preface here that I loathe… In this case, I really don’t want to speculate. Because that's all that's happened in the last 11 months; and I've seen a kid and his family be destroyed over the fact that people are speculating…

Don: Oh, okay.

Joe: That this kid is a murderer, a predator, and all the things he's not -- saying some very hurtful things. I don't know what happened to this girl. I've heard theories. But if you follow what the prosecution is doing now; you know, the fact that a member of the beach patrol, and perhaps three members of the beach patrol, are about to be brought in and charged, possibly with her murder -- I think the conclusion may be not that far off.

[Joe and Don discuss Joe's other client, Jared Paul Stern, of the NY Post's Page Six column, and the Duke rape case.]

Don: You have to take a shower after talking to you about your clients.

Joe: You know, I've heard some of the other people you've had on this week, and the presumption of guilt seems to be the way to go here. But I have a problem with that.

Don: So do I, by the way.

Joe: I represent a kid like Joran v/d Sloot -- and can actually help someone get out from under a rock that looks like it will never get off him. It makes me feel pretty good. So, I don't think I need to shower. As a matter of fact, I don't think I'll shower for two days because of that.

Don: Nancy Grace's already got these people convicted.

Joe: Nancy does what she does. She's very good at it. Nancy and a bunch of other people go on TV and presume guilt at all times. And Joran? I have a list of people. Imus. When I want to collect some money for Joran and buy him a house, I'm going to draw up some lawsuits on some people at the end of this case, for libel and slander. Because people have actually gone out and called him a murderer; and they better be ready to back up those words. And I know who they are. And we're going to make an example of a few people. I'll tell you that much.

Don: Oh you aren't going to do anything.

Joe: You watch. You call him a murderer; right now.

Don: Well I don't watch these shows. I don't know anything about the case. Why would I do that, you moron.

Joe: Well, no one else knows anything about the case, but they call him a murderer.

Don: You're a murderer! [laughter] You're a murderer, a phony, and a pretty boy. Well, thank you, Mr. Uh…

Charles: Tacopina.

Don: Tacopina.

Joe: Thanks, Charles.

Don: …for agreeing to appear on our program and talk about your client. So. Interesting stuff.

Charles: It is.

Joe: It is. And I'm glad you liked my perspective on the Duke case, too.

Don: Well, I agree. We don't know what happened and to convict these people already, seems, just based on… That's why I don't watch these shows. They're tedious.

Joe: Well, a bunch of talking. Whenever I see these cases where there's a woman who's an alleged victim, you know it's almost as if you cannot challenge them because they're a woman and a woman has a right to say no.

Don: Sure.

Joe: But you have to look at the underlying facts. When I was a prosecutor and someone brought me a case that he had an eye witness identification, made a month after the event, by a witness who was intoxicated; I would be very uncomfortable.

Don: You know what would be worse than being stuck on that Roosevelt Island tram for 12 hours?

Joe: Stuck on the Roosevelt Island tram for 12 hours with me?

Don: Right.

Joe: Exactly.

[laughter]

Bernard: [Don Imus' producer] By the way, Bo Dietl did call this Joran v/d Sloot a murderer.

Don: Exactly. You gonna sue him?

Joe: Fortunately for Bo, my friends get immunity. I'm going to give all my friends a pass.

[laughter]

Don: Thanks Joe. Joe Tacopina, here on the Imus in the Morning program.
Last edited by JesseLee on Thu Apr 20, 2006 11:15 pm, edited 2 times in total.
JesseLee
 
Posts: 2458
Joined: Thu Mar 23, 2006 9:27 pm

Postby Nena » Wed Apr 19, 2006 5:13 pm

Thanks Jesse!
User avatar
Nena
 
Posts: 1441
Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 3:07 am
Location: 4° C

Postby concernedmother » Wed Apr 19, 2006 5:16 pm

wow. I guess he is a man of his word. he promised if they dont stop the slander he is going to sue and he sure sounds like he means business.
He probably already has people getting papers drawn up just waiting for this to end.

Go Joe.
concernedmother
 
Posts: 1365
Joined: Thu Mar 23, 2006 10:00 pm

Postby Heli » Wed Apr 19, 2006 5:21 pm

Great job with the transcript. Thank you very much.
User avatar
Heli
Transcription Goddess
 
Posts: 26367
Joined: Thu Mar 23, 2006 9:53 pm
Location: Puffed Up DimWit

Postby Spuds » Wed Apr 19, 2006 5:21 pm

Thank you Jesse....really appreciate.
Spuds
 
Posts: 3158
Joined: Thu Mar 23, 2006 9:20 pm

Postby katya » Wed Apr 19, 2006 5:23 pm

Thanks, JesseLee.
As I told you, it would be absolutely, totally, and in all other ways inconceivable. No one in Guilder knows what we've done, and no one in Florin could have gotten here so fast. - Out of curiosity, why do you ask?
User avatar
katya
Alma Hermosa
 
Posts: 592
Joined: Thu Mar 23, 2006 7:09 pm

Postby Hannie » Wed Apr 19, 2006 5:27 pm

Thanks Jesse!

For the most part it sounded terrific, but i don`t like it that he said the "in and out of consciousness thing" now we are going to get that once again......

I like the lawsuits he is planning, whoop whoop...... :D
User avatar
Hannie
li'l Shango's Mommy
 
Posts: 29668
Joined: Thu Mar 23, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: The Hague, The Netherlands

Postby jmo » Wed Apr 19, 2006 5:32 pm

Thank you Jessie - Great read!

Go Joe :D

Joe: Nancy does what she does. She's very good at it. Nancy and a bunchy of other people go on TV and presume guilt at all times. And Joran? I have a list of people. Imus. When I want to collect some money for Joran and buy him a house, I'm going to draw up some lawsuits on some people at the end of this case, for libel and slander. Because people have actually gone out and called him a murderer; and they better be ready to back up those words. And I know who they are. And we're going to make an example of a few people. I'll tell you that much.
jmo
~Naughty By Nature~
~Naughty By Nature~
 
Posts: 3947
Joined: Thu Mar 23, 2006 9:01 pm

Postby Karamel » Wed Apr 19, 2006 5:46 pm

Thank you Jesse. That was a rather interesting interview. A lot of information -- I particularly enjoyed the part about the upcoming lawsuits!
User avatar
Karamel
 
Posts: 1670
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 9:13 pm

Postby CSI » Wed Apr 19, 2006 6:10 pm

Thanks!!

I am cracking up laughing at this exchange:

Don: How many of them in the party?

Joe: It wasn't a party. It was a bar they were at.

Don: No, how many people were dropped off at the beach, you moron.
Pasa un bon dia!!!!

Image
User avatar
CSI
 
Posts: 3180
Joined: Thu Mar 23, 2006 9:01 pm

Re: Transcript: Don Imus/Joe Tacopina, April 19

Postby justthefactspls » Wed Apr 19, 2006 6:42 pm

Joe: That's not an excuse. It's a mistake. And he admits that mistake. But he has obviously no legal obligation. It doesn't make him a murderer. He hates that happened. But the long story short is that he leaves her on the beach. He goes home. He's on his computer. She says she's going to walk back. And that's the end of it. We don't hear anything else until the next day when her family arrives and approaches them in a very aggressive manner. But listen, interestingly, the people -- the guy who was just arrested, and there are two more people who are about to be arrested, are all members of this beach patrol.


Thanks Jesse! This clears up the discrepancy in earlier posts. He said three people in total from the beach patrol, and only two more possible arrests.
User avatar
justthefactspls
 
Posts: 374
Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 11:37 pm

Re: Transcript: Don Imus/Joe Tacopina, April 19

Postby Fiery » Wed Apr 19, 2006 6:44 pm

justthefactspls wrote:
Joe: That's not an excuse. It's a mistake. And he admits that mistake. But he has obviously no legal obligation. It doesn't make him a murderer. He hates that happened. But the long story short is that he leaves her on the beach. He goes home. He's on his computer. She says she's going to walk back. And that's the end of it. We don't hear anything else until the next day when her family arrives and approaches them in a very aggressive manner. But listen, interestingly, the people -- the guy who was just arrested, and there are two more people who are about to be arrested, are all members of this beach patrol.


Thanks Jesse! This clears up the discrepancy in earlier posts. He said three people in total from the beach patrol, and only two more possible arrests.


incidentally, about four minutes after joe tacopina was on the imus program guess who called in? None other than Mr. Bo Dietl and he never mentioned the NH case.
Fiery
Who died and made YOU Darth Vader?
 
Posts: 8848
Joined: Thu Mar 23, 2006 10:52 pm

Postby justamom » Wed Apr 19, 2006 6:44 pm

jmo wrote:Thank you Jessie - Great read!

Go Joe :D

Joe: Nancy does what she does. She's very good at it. Nancy and a bunchy of other people go on TV and presume guilt at all times. And Joran? I have a list of people. Imus. When I want to collect some money for Joran and buy him a house, I'm going to draw up some lawsuits on some people at the end of this case, for libel and slander. Because people have actually gone out and called him a murderer; and they better be ready to back up those words. And I know who they are. And we're going to make an example of a few people. I'll tell you that much.


ditto :lol:
Honestly I cant wait to see who is sued. Think he will include site owners?
May God treat me today the way I treated others yesterday...
User avatar
justamom
justaMILF
 
Posts: 7447
Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 7:11 am
Location: the country

Postby pax » Wed Apr 19, 2006 6:48 pm

Thanks JL.

Joe: ...It's unbelievable. It's like the Da Vinci code, this thing. It's almost like it's become an obsession with some people -- to try and find out what happened.


I plead the Fifth...
User avatar
pax
 
Posts: 22191
Joined: Thu Mar 23, 2006 8:59 pm
Location: No H8

Postby amicus » Wed Apr 19, 2006 6:50 pm

Hate to be PC but I really didn't like the Kalpoe brothers being called "rug merchants". That bothered me.
User avatar
amicus
 
Posts: 387
Joined: Thu Mar 23, 2006 9:36 pm

Postby justthefactspls » Wed Apr 19, 2006 6:54 pm

amicus wrote:Hate to be PC but I really didn't like the Kalpoe brothers being called "rug merchants". That bothered me.


Good point! ITA! and I don't think you're being PC.
User avatar
justthefactspls
 
Posts: 374
Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 11:37 pm

Postby DiamondDot » Wed Apr 19, 2006 7:02 pm

jmo wrote:Thank you Jessie - Great read!

Go Joe :D

Joe: Nancy does what she does. She's very good at it. Nancy and a bunchy of other people go on TV and presume guilt at all times. And Joran? I have a list of people. Imus. When I want to collect some money for Joran and buy him a house, I'm going to draw up some lawsuits on some people at the end of this case, for libel and slander. Because people have actually gone out and called him a murderer; and they better be ready to back up those words. And I know who they are. And we're going to make an example of a few people. I'll tell you that much.



I was about to quote the same passage.

Go! JoeT Go!

:gwave:
User avatar
DiamondDot
Double D
 
Posts: 9214
Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 8:55 am
Location: Surfin' the Rhythms of the Universe

Postby writergal » Wed Apr 19, 2006 7:05 pm

justthefactspls wrote:
amicus wrote:Hate to be PC but I really didn't like the Kalpoe brothers being called "rug merchants". That bothered me.


Good point! ITA! and I don't think you're being PC.


Nope, not PC at all. That "rug merchants" crap really bothered me, too.
I knew more facts about this case before Natalee went to Aruba.
User avatar
writergal
Satirical Siren
 
Posts: 2804
Joined: Thu Mar 23, 2006 7:22 pm

Postby reddog » Wed Apr 19, 2006 7:14 pm

ty so much, jl!
Image

do consider giving to the trenton duckett reward fund.
User avatar
reddog
**Deactivated**
 
Posts: 13992
Joined: Thu Mar 23, 2006 3:02 am
Location: manning THE No-Bullshit Gang's bullshit detector.

Postby katya » Wed Apr 19, 2006 7:28 pm

writergal wrote:
justthefactspls wrote:
amicus wrote:Hate to be PC but I really didn't like the Kalpoe brothers being called "rug merchants". That bothered me.


Good point! ITA! and I don't think you're being PC.


Nope, not PC at all. That "rug merchants" crap really bothered me, too.


Imus is a racist jerk, I wasn't a bit surprised.
As I told you, it would be absolutely, totally, and in all other ways inconceivable. No one in Guilder knows what we've done, and no one in Florin could have gotten here so fast. - Out of curiosity, why do you ask?
User avatar
katya
Alma Hermosa
 
Posts: 592
Joined: Thu Mar 23, 2006 7:09 pm

Postby victims cry » Wed Apr 19, 2006 7:33 pm

writergal wrote:
justthefactspls wrote:
amicus wrote:Hate to be PC but I really didn't like the Kalpoe brothers being called "rug merchants". That bothered me.


Good point! ITA! and I don't think you're being PC.


Nope, not PC at all. That "rug merchants" crap really bothered me, too.


I dont like it either, but that is Don Imus. On the good side, he calls everyone including white ppl names. He is an equal opportunity shocker.

Listening to Imus is like reading this board at times :) You need a thick skin and an ability to accept that PC doesnt apply all the time. 8)
"If you are worthy of its affection, a cat will be your friend but never your slave."
~Theophile Gautier
User avatar
victims cry
On Vacation!
On Vacation!
 
Posts: 9691
Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2006 3:07 am

Postby reddog » Wed Apr 19, 2006 7:36 pm

victims cry wrote:
writergal wrote:
justthefactspls wrote:
amicus wrote:Hate to be PC but I really didn't like the Kalpoe brothers being called "rug merchants". That bothered me.


Good point! ITA! and I don't think you're being PC.


Nope, not PC at all. That "rug merchants" crap really bothered me, too.


I dont like it either, but that is Don Imus. On the good side, he calls everyone including white ppl names. He is an equal opportunity shocker.

Listening to Imus is like reading this board at times :) You need a thick skin and an ability to accept that PC doesnt apply all the time. 8)



lol. i was just about to post much the same thing. "equal opportunity"

i love don imus.
Image

do consider giving to the trenton duckett reward fund.
User avatar
reddog
**Deactivated**
 
Posts: 13992
Joined: Thu Mar 23, 2006 3:02 am
Location: manning THE No-Bullshit Gang's bullshit detector.

Postby Fiery » Wed Apr 19, 2006 7:38 pm

reddog wrote:
victims cry wrote:
writergal wrote:
justthefactspls wrote:
amicus wrote:Hate to be PC but I really didn't like the Kalpoe brothers being called "rug merchants". That bothered me.


Good point! ITA! and I don't think you're being PC.


Nope, not PC at all. That "rug merchants" crap really bothered me, too.


I dont like it either, but that is Don Imus. On the good side, he calls everyone including white ppl names. He is an equal opportunity shocker.

Listening to Imus is like reading this board at times :) You need a thick skin and an ability to accept that PC doesnt apply all the time. 8)



lol. i was just about to post much the same thing. "equal opportunity"

i love don imus.


Don Imus is a good guy. People tell him things they wouldn't tell anyone else. Andrea Mitchell is a regular guest. So is Joe. So is Dietl.
Fiery
Who died and made YOU Darth Vader?
 
Posts: 8848
Joined: Thu Mar 23, 2006 10:52 pm

Postby mitzid66 » Wed Apr 19, 2006 7:45 pm

writergal wrote:
justthefactspls wrote:
amicus wrote:Hate to be PC but I really didn't like the Kalpoe brothers being called "rug merchants". That bothered me.


Good point! ITA! and I don't think you're being PC.


Nope, not PC at all. That "rug merchants" crap really bothered me, too.


ITA!! As much as really like Imus, he does zip out those non PC comments sometimes!!

They are just so not relevant.

Thanks Jesse! Great job.
If you don't have anything nice to say....Come sit by me.
User avatar
mitzid66
 
Posts: 274
Joined: Thu Mar 23, 2006 9:12 pm

Postby ekg » Wed Apr 19, 2006 7:52 pm

so she was in and out of consciousness.....well Beth will be using that little nugget til Christ comes back....
ekg
 
Posts: 59
Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 10:50 pm


Return to Transcripts, Case Photo Collection, Important Info or Links

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests