iquitos wrote:cleaners. paulus was always on the side of the law. i don't think he would be involved in a burial at sea.
define "involved".....remember what he would do to protect his son/s - "anything"...
Moderator: Fashionista
iquitos wrote:cleaners. paulus was always on the side of the law. i don't think he would be involved in a burial at sea.
Barfdoll wrote:
define "involved".....remember what he would do to protect his son/s - "anything"...
I have often wondered how her colleagues view her actions and how they feel about their gifts to her. As with most people in Mountain Brook they remained silent.Heli wrote:
Sorry, don't buy it and don't excuse it. She was going on international
television with this and regardless of her emotionality or downright
bitterness, there's no excuse whatsoever for broadcasting that to the
world. Her statements were not emotional outbursts, they were
calculated, planned and dead serious. View any of the video where she
makes these accusations!
She long ago erased any sympathy or empathy I may have had for her
plight. I wouldn't trust her further than I could spit and that isn't far.
Ever wonder how her teaching colleagues feel about having given up
so much of their vacation days to her?
Barfdoll wrote:For me, I guess it all boils down to what was the need to have her body disappear? And all I can figure is that Joran was just that selfish/narcisstic - he would deprive someones family of closure/burial/etc just so there were no hiccups whatsoever in his life....just a very inconsiderate act...case closed.
Barfdoll wrote:For me, I guess it all boils down to what was the need to have her body disappear? And all I can figure is that Joran was just that selfish/narcisstic - he would deprive someones family of closure/burial/etc just so there were no hiccups whatsoever in his life....just a very inconsiderate act...case closed.
yankee-in-france wrote:
He does have connections, BB. Paul was an attorney and a judge-in-training. It is a small community. As I said, Joran would never be without counsel. I am not suggesting that Paul's colleagues would break the law to help him out, but come on, favors are done every day of the week. It is not what you know, but who you know. Knowing people in the legal/justice field is a plus for anyone.
yankee-in-france wrote:
He does have connections, BB. Paul was an attorney and a judge-in-training. It is a small community. As I said, Joran would never be without counsel. I am not suggesting that Paul's colleagues would break the law to help him out, but come on, favors are done every day of the week. It is not what you know, but who you know. Knowing people in the legal/justice field is a plus for anyone.
billybob wrote:
I am quite sure that the Van der Sloots would vehemently deny that Paul's position gave them anything in the way of favors, even small ones!! in fact I would contend that they feel just the opposite!
That'swhy Paulus was arrested and had to suffer and still does... That's why Joran is still the only suspect. It did not work to their advantage.
billybob wrote:
I am quite sure that the Van der Sloots would vehemently deny that Paul's position gave them anything in the way of favors, even small ones!! in fact I would contend that they feel just the opposite!
Obscuregawdess wrote:
It did work just the opposite of what the kool-aid drinkers claim!That'swhy Paulus was arrested and had to suffer and still does... That's why Joran is still the only suspect. It did not work to their advantage.
ITA, hun!
billybob wrote:
I am quite sure that the Van der Sloots would vehemently deny that Paul's position gave them anything in the way of favors, even small ones!! in fact I would contend that they feel just the opposite!

luvslalom wrote:
I would think that the majority here being adults could talk without slinging labels, such as kool-aid drinkers amongst others. How do you define this Kool aid drinker? One who thinks for himself/herself and makes an opinion on his/her belief? B/c the poster you are reacting to has just expressed an opinion.
billybob wrote:Yes Puf and OG that is exactly the way it was. In fact, right from the very first because of who Paul was he was not even allowed to even see his son. That was not because he was a suspect in those first few days but an officer of the Court. I would like to see that happen here in the states - It wouldn't. And Joran was only 17 then. I contend if Paul had been able to see him then, we might not even be at this place right now. I believe that Paul just might have had a very positive effect on Joran.
So BS to anyone that thinks that who Paul was, and who Paul knows turned into anything positive for the Van der Sloots, because it most certainly DID NOT!

Topsider wrote:
Did you ever notice
The first time he left the polis station he ran? Then when he did that interview he was sweating all get out when no one else was?
A few days later he was as cool as a cucumber and has been ever since
He and Joran's lawyer(s) never wanted Joran to give any tv interviews. But he did against their advice.
Would you refer to this as being self assured of something?
resigned wrote:
What were the dates that Paulus was denied access to Joran?
Why was attorney Carlo dismissed as Joran's attorney and why didnt' we hear anymore about that? What were the dates that Carlo didn't have access to Joran?
Glenda wrote:
Have you ever been attacked by 85 cameras? Probably not even one... You are way over the top until you've been there.
Barfdoll wrote:For me, I guess it all boils down to what was the need to have her body disappear? And all I can figure is that Joran was just that selfish/narcisstic - he would deprive someones family of closure/burial/etc just so there were no hiccups whatsoever in his life....just a very inconsiderate act...case closed.
Topsider wrote:
No I have never had cameras attack me. They did record my picture once
There was only one maybe two there that day. Don't exaggerate
Return to Natalee Holloway Case Discussion
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 1 guest