Occam's razor cut to the bone

Moderator: Fashionista

Postby frazerclan » Wed Oct 29, 2008 12:56 am

resigned wrote:
It would seem that the simplest answer would be known by the person that was with her last - Joran.


That is not necessarily a true statement. It has a little spin on it. Just because he was the last known person to be with her or to see her doesn't mean he knows what happened to her. I thought this thread was about finding the simplest solution.

Back to the same old she said, he said, she did, he did argument that every thread appears to end up with. Derailed again, eh?
The tree of life is self-pruning
User avatar
frazerclan
 
Posts: 1665
Joined: Fri Mar 31, 2006 4:31 am
Location: Oz

Postby WordsofWisdom » Wed Oct 29, 2008 5:42 am

resigned wrote:
It would seem that the simplest answer would be known by the person that was with her last - Joran.


I agree that it would seem that the simplest answer would be known by the person that was with her last.

Unfortunately it is not (publicly) known who that is.
All we (the public) know is that JVDS is the only one that we (the public) know of. Had the students and adults from MB spoken up instead of attending "prayer" meetings, and scripted interviews- we would know that answer.

There are too many indications that Beth and Jug, etc. were on a mission to cover "something" up by lieing and obstructing the investigation. The only reason for doing something like that (other than mental illness) is if they are complicit in this "disappearance".
"Propaganda is the deliberate, systematic attempt to shape perceptions, manipulate cognitions, and direct behavior to achieve a response that furthers the desired intent of the propagandist."
User avatar
WordsofWisdom
Gone to the great place in the sky
 
Posts: 12505
Joined: Thu Mar 23, 2006 9:51 pm

Re: ok

Postby WordsofWisdom » Wed Oct 29, 2008 5:45 am

AC wrote:
Ahhh, yes.....but Daddy was a Judge In Training and knew what to tell his son and 2K regarding the law.


As did the Twitty boys with grandpa Twitty.
"Propaganda is the deliberate, systematic attempt to shape perceptions, manipulate cognitions, and direct behavior to achieve a response that furthers the desired intent of the propagandist."
User avatar
WordsofWisdom
Gone to the great place in the sky
 
Posts: 12505
Joined: Thu Mar 23, 2006 9:51 pm

Re: ok

Postby all10suspects » Wed Oct 29, 2008 6:31 am

WordsofWisdom wrote:
As did the Twitty boys with grandpa Twitty.


Yes but they did not know Aruban law! Paul knows how to play the system
after being in the system is whole working life!
all10suspects
 
Posts: 6358
Joined: Thu Jul 20, 2006 7:46 am

Re: ok

Postby AC » Wed Oct 29, 2008 6:32 am

WordsofWisdom wrote:
As did the Twitty boys with grandpa Twitty.


The Twitty boys have never been a suspect, like Joran. I have not seen one bit of proof that the Twitty boys were involved in her disappearance, not one. So, continue with your misinformation campaign, but just know that to me, it is getting old.
Hillary Clinton in 2003:
“I am sick and tired of people who say that if you debate and you disagree with this administration somehow you're not patriotic. We should stand up and say we are”
User avatar
AC
**Deactivated**
 
Posts: 8427
Joined: Sun Apr 02, 2006 9:37 pm

Re: ok

Postby Heli » Wed Oct 29, 2008 6:36 am

WordsofWisdom wrote:
AC wrote:Ahhh, yes.....but Daddy was a Judge In Training and knew what to tell his son and 2K regarding the law.


As did the Twitty boys with grandpa Twitty.


Rest assured that the Twittys have several attorneys, LE officials, political contacts etc. on their roster of friends.

It seems AC and others suggest that a person with family members in the judiciary, LE etc. is by default to be suspected of having illegal counsel given to him and 'strings pulled' on his behalf. How utterly preposterous. Yes, it can happen but I find it offensive that it's concluded by default - in this case and all others.
Image
User avatar
Heli
Transcription Goddess
 
Posts: 26367
Joined: Thu Mar 23, 2006 9:53 pm
Location: Puffed Up DimWit

Re: ok

Postby iquitos » Wed Oct 29, 2008 6:38 am

AC wrote:
The Twitty boys have never been a suspect, like Joran. I have not seen one bit of proof that the Twitty boys were involved in her disappearance, not one. So, continue with your misinformation campaign, but just know that to me, it is getting old.


what evidence have you seen joran was? the aruban prosecutor has none. why would you? there is no evidence of who natalee was last with.
Dante described vengeance as "love of justice perverted to revenge and spite".
User avatar
iquitos
 
Posts: 21252
Joined: Sun Mar 26, 2006 9:46 pm
Location: in my mind's eye

Re: ok

Postby WordsofWisdom » Wed Oct 29, 2008 6:41 am

all10suspects wrote:
Yes but they did not know Aruban law! Paul knows how to play the system
after being in the system is whole working life!


Bullcrap.

Not only does Grandpa practice international law, he is politically connected AND his clients include large corporations, and the U.S. government.

And there is THIS:

DEBARDELEBEN, CHARLES W

MCWANE, PHILLIP
WHITLOCK, JEFF
KOEPSEL, BILL
TWITTY, GEORGE
TWITTY, TOM
ENNIS, MITCH

HT to: plhtx1
Charles is Jug's best friend.
Also, not in private practice, so he is not the Twitty's personal atty.

AND...

He is an atty. He's the one that got the Twitty's hooked up with the Souza woman, right away.
"Propaganda is the deliberate, systematic attempt to shape perceptions, manipulate cognitions, and direct behavior to achieve a response that furthers the desired intent of the propagandist."
User avatar
WordsofWisdom
Gone to the great place in the sky
 
Posts: 12505
Joined: Thu Mar 23, 2006 9:51 pm

Re: ok

Postby Heli » Wed Oct 29, 2008 6:42 am

AC wrote:
The Twitty boys have never been a suspect, like Joran. I have not seen one bit of proof that the Twitty boys were involved in her disappearance, not one. So, continue with your misinformation campaign, but just know that to me, it is getting old.


We're all getting old.

The constant refrain of Joran is guilty of something is getting quite old as well. Until "something" is defined as an indictable offense substantiated by valid evidence, I'd say all of the wild speculation and possible scenarios of what happened and where (with no corroborative evidence for any of it) is more than old.
Image
User avatar
Heli
Transcription Goddess
 
Posts: 26367
Joined: Thu Mar 23, 2006 9:53 pm
Location: Puffed Up DimWit

Re: ok

Postby AC » Wed Oct 29, 2008 6:43 am

Heli wrote:
Rest assured that the Twittys have several attorneys, LE officials, political contacts etc. on their roster of friends.

It seems AC and others suggest that a person with family members in the judiciary, LE etc. is by default to be suspected of having illegal counsel given to him and 'strings pulled' on his behalf. How utterly preposterous. Yes, it can happen but I find it offensive that it's concluded by default - in this case and all others.


Heli, it is not preposterous....as it has been stated here many times, "no body, no case". Now, with that mindset, to me sounds like the beginnings of a cover up. That is my opinion. It takes me back to the Caylee Anthony case. Just because there is no body, doesn't mean someone was not involved in a crime. I think Joran was involved in a crime and I think Paul knows more about it than is known...but like I said, that is MY opinion.
Last edited by AC on Wed Oct 29, 2008 6:47 am, edited 1 time in total.
Hillary Clinton in 2003:
“I am sick and tired of people who say that if you debate and you disagree with this administration somehow you're not patriotic. We should stand up and say we are”
User avatar
AC
**Deactivated**
 
Posts: 8427
Joined: Sun Apr 02, 2006 9:37 pm

Re: ok

Postby AC » Wed Oct 29, 2008 6:45 am

iquitos wrote:
what evidence have you seen joran was? the aruban prosecutor has none. why would you? there is no evidence of who natalee was last with.


Ummm, from his own mouth.
Hillary Clinton in 2003:
“I am sick and tired of people who say that if you debate and you disagree with this administration somehow you're not patriotic. We should stand up and say we are”
User avatar
AC
**Deactivated**
 
Posts: 8427
Joined: Sun Apr 02, 2006 9:37 pm

Re: ok

Postby WordsofWisdom » Wed Oct 29, 2008 6:48 am

AC wrote:
The Twitty boys have never been a suspect, like Joran. I have not seen one bit of proof that the Twitty boys were involved in her disappearance, not one.



The FIRST investgation priority is to RULE OUT family members and friends that last had contact with the supposed victim. That didn't happen, in spite of ALE's attempts to do so. It was BLOCKED by the parents (via attorneys). Jug pulled a nutty in the prosecutors office when she dared to ask him questions. (oh my!) Therefore they are still under suspicion. After all Thomas is a WITNESS. But he managed (to date) to escape any questioning.
"Propaganda is the deliberate, systematic attempt to shape perceptions, manipulate cognitions, and direct behavior to achieve a response that furthers the desired intent of the propagandist."
User avatar
WordsofWisdom
Gone to the great place in the sky
 
Posts: 12505
Joined: Thu Mar 23, 2006 9:51 pm

Re: ok

Postby WordsofWisdom » Wed Oct 29, 2008 6:50 am

AC wrote:Just because there is no body, doesn't mean someone was not involved in a crime.


Nor does it mean there is a crime.
"Propaganda is the deliberate, systematic attempt to shape perceptions, manipulate cognitions, and direct behavior to achieve a response that furthers the desired intent of the propagandist."
User avatar
WordsofWisdom
Gone to the great place in the sky
 
Posts: 12505
Joined: Thu Mar 23, 2006 9:51 pm

Re: ok

Postby WordsofWisdom » Wed Oct 29, 2008 6:51 am

AC wrote:Ummm, from his own mouth.


But I thought you said he is a liar? :roll:
"Propaganda is the deliberate, systematic attempt to shape perceptions, manipulate cognitions, and direct behavior to achieve a response that furthers the desired intent of the propagandist."
User avatar
WordsofWisdom
Gone to the great place in the sky
 
Posts: 12505
Joined: Thu Mar 23, 2006 9:51 pm

Re: ok

Postby Heli » Wed Oct 29, 2008 7:32 am

WordsofWisdom wrote:
But I thought you said he is a liar? :roll:


Well, come now WofW, they shall be the judges of when he's telling the truth and lying. :roll:

He's a liar and as such, all that he says must be seen with incredulity unless corroborated.
Image
User avatar
Heli
Transcription Goddess
 
Posts: 26367
Joined: Thu Mar 23, 2006 9:53 pm
Location: Puffed Up DimWit

Re: ok

Postby iquitos » Wed Oct 29, 2008 8:16 am

all10suspects wrote:
Yes but they did not know Aruban law! Paul knows how to play the system
after being in the system is whole working life!


is that why his firstborn sat in the slammer for almost three months? brilliant!
Dante described vengeance as "love of justice perverted to revenge and spite".
User avatar
iquitos
 
Posts: 21252
Joined: Sun Mar 26, 2006 9:46 pm
Location: in my mind's eye

Re: ok

Postby all10suspects » Wed Oct 29, 2008 8:19 am

iquitos wrote:
is that why his firstborn sat in the slammer for almost three months? brilliant!


If Greta and the media did not go down to Aruba, Joran would have been
out in 8 days. After all no evidence of a crime dont you know!
all10suspects
 
Posts: 6358
Joined: Thu Jul 20, 2006 7:46 am

Postby resigned » Wed Oct 29, 2008 8:40 am

frazerclan wrote:
That is not necessarily a true statement. It has a little spin on it. Just because he was the last known person to be with her or to see her doesn't mean he knows what happened to her. I thought this thread was about finding the simplest solution.

Back to the same old she said, he said, she did, he did argument that every thread appears to end up with. Derailed again, eh?


That is the simplest solution to me. What I can't post that without being accused of derailing?

I don't expect either the sea or Joran to own up to it - so we are pretty much in the same place as far as verification purposes.



Two teenagers hook up and go for a joyride after a day and night of partying...stop at a beach - one collapses - the other gets rid of the body.
No body, no case and whatever info they do give - never tell the entire truth. Keep 'em guessing. Like a burlesque.
Image
User avatar
resigned
 
Posts: 44940
Joined: Mon Aug 14, 2006 9:42 pm
Location: Peru

Postby BarneyV » Wed Oct 29, 2008 9:34 am

resigned wrote:
It would seem that the simplest answer would be known by the person that was with her last - Joran.


Bullshit.
BarneyV
 
Posts: 319
Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2006 7:38 pm

Postby all10suspects » Wed Oct 29, 2008 9:48 am

The last person with Natalee:

a. Joran

b. Joran and Paul

c. Joran, Deepak and Satish

d. Joran and Satish

e. Joran and Deepak

---------------------------

What do they all of have in common? Joran. No one else has claimed to have seen Natalee after Joran. Either Natalee ran away or Joran
did something. I vote for the later. JMO!
all10suspects
 
Posts: 6358
Joined: Thu Jul 20, 2006 7:46 am

Postby billybob » Wed Oct 29, 2008 9:56 am

all10suspects wrote:The last person with Natalee:

a. Joran

b. Joran and Paul

c. Joran, Deepak and Satish

d. Joran and Satish

e. Joran and Deepak

---------------------------

What do they all of have in common? Joran. No one else has claimed to have seen Natalee after Joran. Either Natalee ran away or Joran
did something. I vote for the later. JMO!



Or someone that we do not know about -- or Natalee went out to sea and none of us will ever know!
9 most dangerous words... "I'm from the government & I'm here to help".
"Government is not a solution to our problem, government is the problem." Ronald Reagan
User avatar
billybob
 
Posts: 5603
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 6:36 am

Postby all10suspects » Wed Oct 29, 2008 10:03 am

billybob wrote:

Or someone that we do not know about -- or Natalee went out to sea and none of us will ever know!



You would think that Joran and family would want to find out what
happen to Natalee to finally clear themselves from this case. Yet
it seems they have done nothing.
all10suspects
 
Posts: 6358
Joined: Thu Jul 20, 2006 7:46 am

Postby billybob » Wed Oct 29, 2008 10:14 am

all10suspects wrote:

You would think that Joran and family would want to find out what
happen to Natalee to finally clear themselves from this case. Yet
it seems they have done nothing.


Oh now that is where you are wrong they have never stopped trying to find out what happened.
9 most dangerous words... "I'm from the government & I'm here to help".
"Government is not a solution to our problem, government is the problem." Ronald Reagan
User avatar
billybob
 
Posts: 5603
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 6:36 am

Postby all10suspects » Wed Oct 29, 2008 10:21 am

billybob wrote:
Oh now that is where you are wrong they have never stopped trying to find out what happened.


I have seen nothing any where that they are trying to find out what happen. All I have seen is a clip of the RG show that puts Natalee in a bad light and Anitas paintings. Please show something good they have tired to do.
all10suspects
 
Posts: 6358
Joined: Thu Jul 20, 2006 7:46 am

Postby resigned » Wed Oct 29, 2008 10:26 am

billybob wrote:
Oh now that is where you are wrong they have never stopped trying to find out what happened.


Do they think the Thailand Tour will work? - Will they tell anyone else when they hear the whole truth - if they don't already know it?
Last edited by resigned on Wed Oct 29, 2008 10:27 am, edited 2 times in total.
Image
User avatar
resigned
 
Posts: 44940
Joined: Mon Aug 14, 2006 9:42 pm
Location: Peru

PreviousNext

Return to Natalee Holloway Case Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 0 guests