Bongo wrote:
One, two, three, hundred arrests of a 'suspects' does not imply 'guilt'.
I wonder, is it really THAT hard to understand some very simple basic principles of criminal law procedure??
Have you informed ALE and the KLPD of this?
Moderator: Fashionista
Bongo wrote:
One, two, three, hundred arrests of a 'suspects' does not imply 'guilt'.
I wonder, is it really THAT hard to understand some very simple basic principles of criminal law procedure??

resigned wrote:
Have you informed ALE and the KLPD of this?
AC wrote:
IQ, with what we know now regarding Natalee's disappearance, do you think Joran was responsible?
The Investigators on this case has many times said all roads lead back to Joran. This was before he had his "time" with Vander Eem. So, what is your gut feeling?
Also, do you think there is a possibility that evidence was suppressed in any way with this case, due to Joran's Dad and his status on Aruba?
all10suspects wrote:
Being that daddy is friends with the top cop at the time and the judge that makes rulings on this case I thinkt they all did what they could do to
protect Joran. Friends helping friends. JMO!
iquitos wrote:
why do you insist on repeating a defamation you cannot support?
AC wrote:
This was my entire post....interesting snip job, WOW, with no indication of such.
Heli, it is not preposterous....as it has been stated here many times, "no body, no case". Now, with that mindset, to me sounds like the beginnings of a cover up. That is my opinion. It takes me back to the Caylee Anthony case. Just because there is no body, doesn't mean someone was not involved in a crime. I think Joran was involved in a crime and I think Paul knows more about it than is known...but like I said, that is MY opinion.
all10suspects wrote:
JMO! or else they would have removed themselves from the case like they do in the states. Not saying they did just that one never knows!
GBMW wrote:Indeed All10...they even haven't been very helpful towards the LE that are trying hard to find out what happened.
WordsofWisdom wrote:
Whaaattttt?!???
resigned wrote:Him and Julia were hiding Natalee out. Take it as serious as you like.
WordsofWisdom wrote:
I, and others do it all the time.
The purpose is to quote the part you are responding to so as not to waste my, or other people's time quoting something that has nothing to do with my response. And I will continue to do it so as not to waste my, or other people's time quoting something that has nothing to do with my response. Its done all the time. I didn't change your meaning, I simply had nothing to say about the rest of that post, so I didn't, so as not to waste my, or other people's time quoting something that has nothing to do with my response. And I will continue to do it so as not to waste my, or other people's time quoting something that has nothing to do with my response.
WordsofWisdom wrote:
If that was true, then why do you insist on dumping on anyone that believes JVDS is innocent of any wrongdoing?
If it isn't true, then why post it.
Seriously.

Bongo wrote:resigned wrote:
Have you informed ALE and the KLPD of this?
Why should I... ???
I'm quite confident ALE and KLPD do act according basic principles of criminal law procedure.
------------------
So far so good;
all fine with me!
Het Recht Zal Zegevieren!!
PS In this respect I can recommend you buying & translating & reading THIS -click-

WordsofWisdom wrote:
I, and others do it all the time.
The purpose is to quote the part you are responding to so as not to waste my, or other people's time quoting something that has nothing to do with my response. And I will continue to do it so as not to waste my, or other people's time quoting something that has nothing to do with my response. Its done all the time. I didn't change your meaning, I simply had nothing to say about the rest of that post, so I didn't, so as not to waste my, or other people's time quoting something that has nothing to do with my response. And I will continue to do it so as not to waste my, or other people's time quoting something that has nothing to do with my response.
all10suspects wrote:
How many times do lawyers and judges take themselves off the case in the states? Even the Aruban PM want Mr Statten off the case. Why?
resigned wrote:
Wasted days and wasted nights....
frazerclan wrote:
26,580 posts in 800 days gives just over 33 posts per day ... nah, you've got no time to waste!

iquitos wrote:
one would think learning to spell his name would be in order given your fatal obsession with his inherent evil.

Return to Natalee Holloway Case Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests