The Refugees Unleashed

by **Need2Know** » Wed Jun 17, 2009 11:12 am

WordsofWisdom wrote:
What about those people that are "involved" and actually insert themselves into the private lives of those that are simply discussing the case?

Even worse

by **Black-Tulip** » Wed Jun 17, 2009 11:18 am

Hannie wrote:
Because there are so many certifiable nutso's in this case, some people/groups identify themselfs with them...

That's my messageboard junkie opinion....

The seeking contact does not only come from the posters' side.

The Holloway family did nothing to prevent or stop it, on the contrary, they encouraged contacts with posters. In fact they are very involved in the message boards themselves. Isn't Beth's brother poster Private Eye on Scared Monkeys? Hasn't Robin been active on several boards?
And you can say the same but on a much lesser scale about the vd Sloots.

typo

by **Hannie** » Wed Jun 17, 2009 11:23 am

Look at which thread I posted this, Tulip... :lol:

I would hardly compare the monkeys and their sick/dangerous obsessions etc. with other people who have contact with people on Aruba or the US for that matter...

by **wanderer** » Wed Jun 17, 2009 11:43 am

Hannie wrote:Why, you want her phone#?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cYFtcfAYnUQ

by **Hannie** » Wed Jun 17, 2009 11:46 am

Maybe that's more suitable in the MonKKKey Thread...

by **wanderer** » Wed Jun 17, 2009 11:47 am

You put it in. :roll:

by **Linda in L.A.** » Wed Jun 17, 2009 11:56 am

Black-Tulip wrote:
The seeking contact does not only come from the posters' side.

The Hollow family did nothing to prevent or stop it, on the contrary, they encouraged contacts with posters. In fact they are very involved in the message boards themselves. Isn't Beth's brother poster Private Eye on Scared Monkeys? Hasn't Robin been active on several boards?
And you can say the same but on a much lesser scale about the vd Sloots.

That we know of anyway BT.

by **resigned** » Wed Jun 17, 2009 12:09 pm

Black-Tulip wrote:
The seeking contact does not only come from the posters' side.

The Hollow family did nothing to prevent or stop it, on the contrary, they encouraged contacts with posters. In fact they are very involved in the message boards themselves. Isn't Beth's brother poster Private Eye on Scared Monkeys? Hasn't Robin been active on several boards?
And you can say the same but on a much lesser scale about the vd Sloots.

You can. I can't. I think the Slot family & friends have utilized the boards to the fullest extent for their own purposes.

by **sarge** » Wed Jun 17, 2009 12:09 pm

Linda in L.A. wrote:[/b]

That we know of anyway BT.

Maybe by proxy.

by **K Hemingway** » Wed Jun 17, 2009 12:21 pm

Sometimes I read here and wonder if some childhood fantasies still haunt some people...'monsters under the bed....hiding in the closets'...were they all from Aruba?

The suspicion really kinda creeps me out.

by **Black-Tulip** » Wed Jun 17, 2009 12:30 pm

sarge wrote:
Maybe by proxy.

I said on a lesser scale.

inhabitants:

Aruba: 100.000
USA: 300.000.000

the ratio is 1 to 3.000

Do you really think the vd Sloots got more support than the Holloways?

by **sarge** » Wed Jun 17, 2009 12:40 pm

Black-Tulip wrote:
I said on a lesser scale.

inhabitants:

Aruba: 100.000
USA: 300.000.000

the ratio is 1 to 3.000

Do you really think the vd Sloots got more support than the Holloways?

You did say that.

As far as influencing the case one way or another I don't think that any message board poster has done that. Some may believe that they have but it is doubtful.
family support? probably not.

by **Black-Tulip** » Wed Jun 17, 2009 12:56 pm

sarge wrote:
You did say that.

As far as influencing the case one way or another I don't think that any message board poster has done that. Some may believe that they have but it is doubtful.
family support? probably not.

My own opinion is certainly affected by some message board posters.

But you are probably right, our opinion has no influence on the case.

by **Need2Know** » Wed Jun 17, 2009 1:07 pm

sarge wrote:
You did say that.

As far as influencing the case one way or another I don't think that any message board poster has done that. Some may believe that they have but it is doubtful.
family support? probably not.

sarge, let's not kid ourselves here, some posters felt they were going to reveal the "real truth" - many of us have been around long enough on this case to know this. People were conducting their own investigations and inserting themselves into all of this.

by **prolific** » Wed Jun 17, 2009 1:07 pm

Need2Know wrote:
sarge, let's not kid ourselves here, some posters felt they were going to reveal the "real truth" - many of us have been around enough long enough on this case to know this. People were conducting their own investigations and inserting themselves into all of this.

And still are to this day...

by **petals** » Wed Jun 17, 2009 1:20 pm

prolific wrote:
Need2Know wrote:sarge, let's not kid ourselves here, some posters felt they were going to reveal the "real truth" - many of us have been around enough long enough on this case to know this. People were conducting their own investigations and inserting themselves into all of this.

And still are to this day...

You said it. I haven't looked at SM in a few days but I'll bet you can go there right now and see calls for vigilante justice, not only against J2K, but against the crew of The Persistence, Tim Miller, Dave Holloway, Fred Golba, and any number of anonymous internet posters (all of whom they have investigated real life information on). All based on their version of "the truth" as revealed to them by Kermit the Frog.

by **LoRain** » Wed Jun 17, 2009 4:25 pm

Kermit seems to not be croaking much on this last go around of "behind the scenes" stuff going on right now.....wonder why that is....

by **Black-Tulip** » Wed Jun 17, 2009 4:33 pm

LoRain wrote:Kermit seems to not be croaking much on this last go around of "behind the scenes" stuff going on right now.....wonder why that is....

Someone promised to sue her isn't it? Maybe it finally happened.

by **LoRain** » Wed Jun 17, 2009 4:40 pm

Heehee....

by **sarge** » Wed Jun 17, 2009 5:39 pm

Need2Know wrote:
sarge, let's not kid ourselves here, some posters felt they were going to reveal the "real truth" - many of us have been around long enough on this case to know this. People were conducting their own investigations and inserting themselves into all of this.

I don't read that Monkey stuff but yes, there are posters who claim to speak the truth and even know what ALE believes. That would have to come from someone with access and I just don't believe it.
I remember all the "I know but cannot tell". That ended up to be a big dud.
I always wondered if Antonio Carlo really had a secret meeting with Karin Janssen and what he told her. I guess we will never know.

by **Black-Tulip** » Wed Jun 17, 2009 5:57 pm

sarge wrote:
I don't read that Monkey stuff but yes, there are posters who claim to speak the truth and even know what ALE believes. That would have to come from someone with access and I just don't believe it.
I remember all the "I know but cannot tell". That ended up to be a big dud.
I always wondered if Antonio Carlo really had a secret meeting with Karin Janssen and what he told her. I guess we will never know.

You should read at the monkey site for once. You wouldn't believe your eyes.

Oh, but people involved in a any way in this case do have relatives and friends. Of course there is "I know but cannot tell" stuff.

by **resigned** » Wed Jun 17, 2009 6:21 pm

Black-Tulip wrote:
You should read at the monkey site for once. You wouldn't believe your eyes.

Oh, but people involved in a any way in this case do have relatives and friends. Of course there is "I know but cannot tell" stuff.

Why bother - you and others bring all the "highlights" here. Saves me time to do other things. :lol:

Thanks.....

If anyone - friend or family really knows anything that is of evidentiary value, even if it is to exclude a suspect - than they should tell LE and not be speculating on a message board and pretending they possess the "Real Truth" - JMO

by **Black-Tulip** » Wed Jun 17, 2009 6:59 pm

resigned wrote:
Why bother - you and others bring all the "highlights" here. Saves me time to do other things. Thanks.....

If anyone - friend or family really knows anything that is of evidentiary value, even if it is to exclude a suspect - than they should tell LE and not be speculating on a message board and pretending they possess the "Real Truth" - JMO

Show me all the Monkey stuff I brought over. Thanks ....

I wasn't talking about stuff LE doesn't know already.

by **suraja** » Wed Jun 17, 2009 7:15 pm

Nut44x4
Maine - USA
Global Moderator
Scared Monkey

Re: Natalee Case Discussion #820 6/10/09 -
« Reply #466 on: June 16, 2009, 07:16:26 PM »

jen.....you should see some of the sites I have signed up to in order to spy/check up on/learn about/watch/etc. certain people/issues/things, etc. disgusting, lol. I hope when I die my computer dies with me, lmao. My Son would be shocked at some of the crap I have on here, but it is necessary for me to do what I do.

------------------------------
When the time comes I feel very sorry for her son when he learns the truth about his mother.

by **resigned** » Wed Jun 17, 2009 8:20 pm

Black-Tulip wrote:
Show me all the Monkey stuff I brought over. Thanks ....

I wasn't talking about stuff LE doesn't know already.

You don't do it very often - but you have done it. ( lookey see what she posted over there? ) :lol:

How would you know what stuff that LE already knows or doesn't know? :wink:

The Refugees Unleashed

The MonKKKey Cage thread ~ New Edition

Who is online