Moderator: Fashionista

yankee-in-france wrote:I don't know because my life experiences tell me that if someone is sleeping, you can wake them up. If you attempt waking them up and it doesn't work and then you shake them and they still don't wake up, I think that the person might at best be unconscious or at worse, dead but JMO, and I also think that Joran did mention his inability to awaken Natalee to ALE which could well be the basis for the death by overdose.
yankee-in-france wrote:I don't know because my life experiences tell me that if someone is sleeping, you can wake them up. If you attempt waking them up and it doesn't work and then you shake them and they still don't wake up, I think that the person might at best be unconscious or at worse, dead but JMO, and I also think that Joran did mention his inability to awaken Natalee to ALE which could well be the basis for the death by overdose.
sarge wrote:DOMPIG: Yes. That‘s definitely in the statements, and that‘s why we were kind of disappointed when the judge didn‘t accept that because that‘s basically a felony in Aruba. We think that what happened was that the judge just didn‘t buy it the way—because Joran went back and forth with his statements, and he withdrew two statements which he had already given to us. So basically, none of his statements were really trustworthy.
So Joran did say it and it was in some of his statements.
He was going back and forth and did withdraw two statements. It was probably after he realized that he had cofessed to a felony if he was fondling a girl who did not know what he was doing . It would depend on the judge and how he interpreted Joran's statements. It is a shame because at that point he may have eventually told the whole story. Interesting too that the Kalpoes were apparently no part of it.
petals wrote:I still think it's open to interpretation. First of all, Joran gave conflicting statements at different times so the court had to do the same thing that we are doing - that is, pick and choose which ones to believe. And also, just saying that Natalee passed out at some point (and came to and passed out again or whatever) does not necessarily mean that a felony was committed. Remember also that, after the Skeeters tapes played on the Dr. Phil Show, Dompig clearly said that none of the suspects had confessed to any sexual crime against Natalee. So I guess I'm not ready to say that the judge was in on the coverup.
sarge wrote:DOMPIG: Yes. That‘s definitely in the statements, and that‘s why we were kind of disappointed when the judge didn‘t accept that because that‘s basically a felony in Aruba. We think that what happened was that the judge just didn‘t buy it the way—because Joran went back and forth with his statements, and he withdrew two statements which he had already given to us. So basically, none of his statements were really trustworthy.
So Joran did say it and it was in some of his statements.
He was going back and forth and did withdraw two statements. It was probably after he realized that he had cofessed to a felony if he was fondling a girl who did not know what he was doing . It would depend on the judge and how he interpreted Joran's statements. It is a shame because at that point he may have eventually told the whole story. Interesting too that the Kalpoes were apparently no part of it.
prolific wrote:What difference would reading the rest make...Point was did he say it or not say it, was it in his statements or not, we've been saying that Beth just made it up, twisted, he never said that in his statements, she just dozed for a bit.......now that we see Dompig said it really was in his statements we need to say yabbut, it must have been just one of those little differences, yabbut Natalee was drunk, yabbut ALE was just after him and on and on...how long before we say...he was just telling ALE what they wanted to hear, he was lying because he was scared...MBers lie, Beth lies..
If Natalee was really that drunk and unaware of what was happening wouldn't it have been noticeable to J2K how drunk and unaware of what was happening she was? Maybe another of his 'little differences' was that when, according to his words, he was fingering her, it was when she was passed out and unaware of what was happening.....funny that one of the prime suspects later story changes was that she wasn't drunk...

sarge wrote:I watched that program, Henk. I don't remember all of Dompig's interviews word for word but at the time I was believing everything that the said. He would say that they were in the final stages of the case and I sure thought he meant it.
I did not remember that it was Joran who said that Natalee was fading in and out of consciousness but do remember that Joran told Freddy that the girl did not come awake at some point or at least Freddy said that he did.
I remember Dompig saying that he thought the boys were guilty of something but he just did not know what. Whatever, this case is probably never going to be solved. It has been too messed up in Aruba and Joe T said that same thing.
henk wrote:
I believed Dompig too, Sarge. But at the same time I was always suspicious when it came to translations.. And for Dompig, Janssen, Mos etcetera.. English is not their native language and there can be easily a mixup in the questions and answers.. I don't even trust the statements given in Pap. and translated later..Even in my own language, words don't always mean the same thing, and I have to admit .. I said things sometimes what I meant different.. and needed more explanation..
Perhaps we should ask YIF if she can translate France into English or vice versa without surching for a different word sometimes..
IMO.. Joran didn't say those exact words.. "in and out of consciousness"

yankee-in-france wrote:
I agree, Henk. You can't translate literally because the literal translation many times is ridiculous, but knowing what it means, you can then translate in English but many times it doesn't even resemble the literal translation. Now that's about as clear as ....
ETA ... now you know why I don't do many translations.
sarge wrote:Henk, you have a good point.
Domig is an articulate English speaker. He was trained at Quantico in the United States and he is obviously a very smart man. I believe that Dompig would not have a lot of problem with interpretations.
You could say the same thing about Joran's interpretations about comments that Natalee made. Joran does also speak English very well but it is not his first language.
sarge wrote:Henk, that was something about Dompig speaking to the press so much. He probably said way more than he should have many times and may have just been speaking police talk. It is understandable that a gag order was finally placed on him.
I wonder why he left the police department.
Dompig put some of his own opinions I think in those many intervews.
The 48 hrs interview was interesting but puzzling too. He said Natalee was dug up and buried somewhere else.
henk wrote:
Thanks YIF..
Edit in.. I mean thank you for your answer.. Not that you think I thank you for not translating..![]()
![]()

Return to Natalee Holloway Case Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests