iquitos wrote:imaginative phase happened later?
No. How do you interpret that from what I posted.?
Moderator: Fashionista
iquitos wrote:imaginative phase happened later?

resigned wrote:
No. How do you interpret that from what I posted.?
iquitos wrote:what happened to natalee. he is only responsible for her to the extent she accepted his help. if she indeed refused to go back to the hotel what is he supposed to do? how would he even begin to imagine these consequences? i am sure he would feel responsible and even guilty but what is he supposed to do? Isn't that what he asked the speech therapist the first night when she bitched him out? what a venal woman.
iquitos wrote:what happened to natalee. he is only responsible for her to the extent she accepted his help. if she indeed refused to go back to the hotel what is he supposed to do? how would he even begin to imagine these consequences? i am sure he would feel responsible and even guilty but what is he supposed to do? Isn't that what he asked the speech therapist the first night when she bitched him out? what a venal woman.
resigned wrote:
No. How do you interpret that from what I posted.?
iquitos wrote:
you are right. joran may be imaginative but i don't see how he could have imagined the mess he got himself into by leaving a woman at the beach because she didn't want to leave and he had to get home. tourists don't usually disappear from the beach in aruba, even at night.

iquitos wrote:deepak's idea.
K_Meine wrote:Why did the body HAVE TO disappear? If she "seized" as reported why not just leave it and run?
resigned wrote:
But as soon as he heard there were police "outside his house" his imagination went into overdrive and decided it would be best to lie? I don't think so........
K_Meine wrote: Beware of the "over explainer".
K_Meine wrote:
Why did the body HAVE TO disappear? If she "seized" as reported why not just leave it and run?
WordsofWisdom wrote:
I assume you are talking about the various talking heads that "reported" that Natalee died from over consumption of drugs (and alcohol). This information supposedly came from a good source.
Well, tell me- who would KNOW
#1. that she died
#2. From drugs and alcohol?
The only person(s) that COULD know would be someone that saw her AFTER JORAN, AND was able to determine cause of death. (duhhh)
A little logic and common sense applied to these ridiculous attempts at ending the controversy certainly makes a difference.
prolific wrote:
Baloney...it was one of their ( ALE..who included FBI) working theories among other theories...they never 'reported' as FACT that Natalee od'd from drugs and alcohol...and there weren't various talking heads.
prolific wrote:The one that 'reported' that she 'seized' was the prime suspect to Patrick.
WordsofWisdom wrote:prolific wrote:
Baloney...it was one of their ( ALE..who included FBI) working theories among other theories...they never 'reported' as FACT that Natalee od'd from drugs and alcohol...and there weren't various talking heads.
Yes Bill O'Reilly (among at least one other) stated it as FACT.
FOXNEWS.COM HOME > U.S.
Source: Natalee Holloway Died of Drug Overdose
Friday, July 20, 2007
Natalee Holloway
B.O. Stated:
Natalee Holloway died from cardiac arrest caused by an accidental drug overdose, a source has told The O'Reilly Factor.
"The Factor has learned from sources we have to protect that Natalee Holloway, the 18-year-old Alabama woman who disappeared two years ago in Aruba, died from cardiac arrest brought on by an overdose of cocaine," Bill O'Reilly said on his Thursday program.
NOT STATED:
The theory offered by the source, a top law enforcement official, could not be confirmed independently because Holloway's body has not been found.
Wouldn't the time he has already served count? So, a conviction would break even?K_Meine wrote:I came across this article and it really made me think about the darker side of humanity.Mos said he and the Holloway family feel pursuing a minor charge "doesn't serve a purpose."
A person convicted of making a body disappear, for example, would serve only six months in prison, he said.
The search for Holloway spanned more than two years and involved hundreds of volunteers, Aruban soldiers, FBI agents and even Dutch F-16 jets laden with search equipment.
"We have a strong conviction that something happened that night, and that it was a very serious thing," Mos said. "The question is whether we are able to prove it."
He said he does not anticipate ever finding Holloway's remains.
"It's very hard to try a case without a body," he said. "It's not impossible, but you need substantial evidence that somebody was killed."
Doesn't serve a purpose? Only 6 months for disappearing a body, potentially a live one at that? So Beth couldn't get Joran put away for 25 years so the hell with it all together. That's weak. Thoughts on this?
Luke Davis wrote:Wouldn't the time he has already served count? So, a conviction would break even?

resigned wrote:
I bet Paulus knows. I bet he also knows the difference between being convicted and just calling it even-steven for a Joran "panic attack".
iquitos wrote:
if not, he can look it up at the law library. geen lijk geen zaak.

sarge wrote:Even if he would get credit for time served, Wouldn't he have a conviction on his record if the judge(s) ruled against him? Is body disposal a felony or misdemeanor in Holland?
K_Meine wrote:I came across this article and it really made me think about the darker side of humanity.Mos said he and the Holloway family feel pursuing a minor charge "doesn't serve a purpose."
A person convicted of making a body disappear, for example, would serve only six months in prison, he said.
The search for Holloway spanned more than two years and involved hundreds of volunteers, Aruban soldiers, FBI agents and even Dutch F-16 jets laden with search equipment.
"We have a strong conviction that something happened that night, and that it was a very serious thing," Mos said. "The question is whether we are able to prove it."
He said he does not anticipate ever finding Holloway's remains.
"It's very hard to try a case without a body," he said. "It's not impossible, but you need substantial evidence that somebody was killed."
Doesn't serve a purpose? Only 6 months for disappearing a body, potentially a live one at that? So Beth couldn't get Joran put away for 25 years so the hell with it all together. That's weak. Thoughts on this?
sarge wrote:Even if he would get credit for time served, Wouldn't he have a conviction on his record if the judge(s) ruled against him? Is body disposal a felony or misdemeanor in Holland?
Return to Natalee Holloway Case Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests