cajun_mali wrote:After 20 or so unsigned statements, one had something they thought they could use against 2k to get them to testify against j.
We do not know the statement was not signed
Moderator: Fashionista
cajun_mali wrote:After 20 or so unsigned statements, one had something they thought they could use against 2k to get them to testify against j.

FloridaDoug wrote:
We do not know the statement was not signed
petals wrote:We (maybe not you, but myself and some other people on this board) already had this debate a few months ago. After the Skeeters' tapes aired on Dr. Phil, Dompig said that none of the suspects ever confessed to any sexual conduct that would amount to a crime.
FloridaDoug wrote:
We do not know the statement was not signed
cajun_mali wrote:FloridaDoug wrote:
We do not know the statement was not signed
In my opinion a signed statement would have had the weight in court to keep J in detention. Just my opinion.
Remember, Dompig said he needed verification from 2k.
cajun_mali wrote:FloridaDoug wrote:
We do not know the statement was not signed
We don't know if it's really in a statement.
resigned wrote:1) Did Dompig ever actually interrogate any of the suspects before he went on to the other things?
2) I don't recall if his name was on any of the PV's or not.![]()
3) He acted more like a LE spokesperson - except for the "misinformation campaign" and using the press to circulate whatever his latest theory happened to be ....
FloridaDoug wrote:
Joran was kept in detention all summer long
DOMPIG: No, they did not. They keep denying it, and they only went so far as to say that they fondled sexually. At least, Joran did that, and the others denied everything.
COSBY: Now, did Joran—we‘ve heard from the family, Chief, that—you know, that Joran was claiming in some statement that she was going in and out of consciousness. Have you seen that anywhere?
DOMPIG: Yes. That‘s definitely in the statements, and that‘s why we were kind of disappointed when the judge didn‘t accept that because that‘s basically a felony in Aruba. We think that what happened was that the judge just didn‘t buy it the way—because Joran went back and forth with his statements, and he withdrew two statements which he had already given to us. So basically, none of his statements were really trustworthy.
COSBY: But what you‘re saying, Chief, is that he did say that, at some point, she was in and out of consciousness. You‘re saying that‘s a felony in Aruba. where did he say that happened, in the back of the car?
DOMPIG: In the back of the car. He mentioned a couple of times that she passed out a couple of times. Those were his words. But in a way that someone that‘s drunk, that‘s kind of like not really aware of what‘s happening. And that was to us very interesting and very important because we thought, as investigators, that we had at least that. But again, what we are faced with—we‘re faced with, I think that Dave will also have that experience, that it was very disappointing that at a certain point in time, the judge didn‘t buy it.
cajun_mali wrote:In my opinion a signed statement would have had the weight in court to keep J in detention. Just my opinion.
FloridaDoug wrote:
Joran was held in detention all summer long
cajun_mali wrote:
And ALE wanted to continue holding him.
I'm wondering if "withdrew" meant he didn't sign ... purely supposition.
FloridaDoug wrote:
Or the statement was superceded by another
cajun_mali wrote:FloridaDoug wrote:
Or the statement was superceded by another
Mostly an ALE mistake. Too many statements, it looks like they were ambushing J by creating a lot of stuff to cherry pick from. Dompig did say J talked about N passing out in the back of the car. Police car or Deepak's.
Return to Natalee Holloway Case Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests