Prolific, I have heard of the above but I have never seen that video before.
Pat, thanks for link. I have not followed the NH case in quite some time.
What made me wonder:
Those are some serious allegations about Jug Twitty. If there is nothing to it why did he not go after them? They are all in the US, Jug Twitty has even some 'connections' to politicians and some rich friends. And he should be easily be able to afford an attorney.
It was much more difficult for Deepak and Satish to go after Dr. Phil and Skeeters. But they did.
I suppose the same can be said for a lot of people...why didn't they sue if it's not true? I don't think suing or not suing is the basis for saying it must be true then.
I'm certainly no Jug fan but how do you sue and prove their allegations are false? Natalee certainly isn't here to dispute she wasn't pregnant with his baby or she wasn't being moilested by Jug or that she didn't run away or meet up with people after she left the prime suspect or that she didn't die til two weeks later.
Why didn't the VDS sue Hodges or Jossy or DeVries or or that psychic Carla Baron, who did Haunting Evidence or any other people? They all made some pretty serious allegations...were they all true?
Why didn't they even speak out publically to dispute them all....were they all true since they didn't? All the prime suspect talked about suing DeVries for was copyright..seems strange if he was planning to sue that that's all he would sue for.
I believe there is a quote from Dompig stating that these two were crazy and had a different wild story all the time...no credibility....I don't think there are very many people who bought what they tried to sell so why not just ignore obvious kooks..