Slickster wrote:But for a miminal fee, you can still grab a piece of the action.
![]()
![]()
Roll Tide Twitty!
edited to fix margins, incase it was me blowing them.
SICK
Moderator: Fashionista
Slickster wrote:But for a miminal fee, you can still grab a piece of the action.
![]()
![]()
Roll Tide Twitty!
edited to fix margins, incase it was me blowing them.
Glenda wrote:
SICK
AlwaysL8 wrote:
another hoax
Slickster wrote:
Another?
It's all a hoax.
Mountain Brook, Alabama!!!!
![]()
George 'Jug' Twitty!
WordsofWisdom wrote:
If it isn't relevant then why lie about it?
CancunMole wrote:
That's IT! Who, of all the possibles, even brought up the(ir) arrival time? Why and Who should it even matter to? Only the 'after the fact's' who appear to be trying to subliminally attempt to establish some pre-proposed arrival, yet after the fact.
Sorry, but if the Aruban POLIS couldn't acquire the specific arrival time of the girl's Mum et al through their OWN Aruban Customs People, then once again those who believe that is what happened are, again only indicating and proving the incompetence of the Aruban Law Enforcement as not being capable of even the most obvious FIRSTS, let alone figuring out who and what happened to NH, DUH.
Can't have it ALL ways.
It doesn't mean that Aruba, the Island is at fault, but it does say to me that something did happen there and whoever was involved had a lot of bases covered.
I also think that there are some here who should consider taking a break, maybe even breaking loose and taking a trip to Aruba....
Sorry, but if the Aruban POLIS couldn't acquire the specific arrival time of the girl's Mum et al through their OWN Aruban Customs People, then once again those who believe that is what happened are, again only indicating and proving the incompetence of the Aruban Law Enforcement as not being capable of even the most obvious FIRSTS, let alone figuring out who and what happened to NH, DUH.
"it does say to me that something did happen there and whoever was involved had a lot of bases covered."
Claudio Stamper, President of Jet International, Has Been Selected for Inclusion in the 2008-2009 Princeton Premier Registry
Oranjestad, Aruba, January 17, 2008 --(PR.com)-- Claudio Stamper, President of Jet International, has been selected for inclusion in the 2008-2009 Princeton Premier Registry. Claudio makes his home in Aruba and his personal specialty is in aviation and marketing. Claudio manages two companies and has a vast knowledge of the aviation world. As President, Claudio oversees sales and daily operations as well as dealing with airport administration. Claudio studies aviation management in Miami and has on to carve out a very successful career for himself. He not only handles planes but private jets as well.
In his spare time Claudio enjoys golf, the beach and just spending quality time with his kids. He keeps up with current business trends and news by reading Forbes Magazine and Investors Business Daily. As a way of giving back to his community Claudio contributes to local charities showing his altruistic nature. His biography will now be listed alongside other Aviation professionals who are leaders in their industry. Claudio is a welcome addition in the 2008-2009 Princeton Premier Registry.
About Princeton Premier:
Princeton Premier is the publisher of an exclusive registry comprised of business leaders and professionals making an impact in their industry and community. The online network is a large interactive business community where their valued members use the web based service daily as an online channel to assist them in meeting their specific business goals.

Glenda wrote:
Gielen interviewed lots of people, I don't think Gielen was concerned if the people she interviewed got along.
Slickster wrote:But for a miminal fee, you can still grab a piece of the action.
![]()
![]()
Roll Tide Twitty!
edited to fix margins, incase it was me blowing them.
luvslalom wrote:
I would agree since she wasn't concerned much with the truth either.
GBMW wrote:
luvslalom wrote:
Good morning G.
GBMW wrote:
Good afternoon!![]()
I just had a great laugh...went to read in the Patrick arrested thread.
luvslalom wrote:
I would agree since she wasn't concerned much with the truth either.
Bongo wrote:
Concern.. ah, you do, do you..
What have you done lately to show your concern with the truth?
Ow, I see, you mean petertje, you know, huge concerns with the truthCase solved LOL
Or should I ask GBMW the same question.. referring to her agreeing ''
luvslalom wrote:
There were a number of things Gielen said as being true however what gets me riled most, and I will pick one...is the Natalee molested by her stepfather.
Gielen never stated that Natalee was molested by Jug. You are confused.
The 2 pyschics said it.
Message board fodder and she has no proof of anything. There was a little group with a private space that concocted crap and then sent forth some posters with the misinfo and therein lies the proof of Gielens.
Well that's crap as well.
What about Petertje? You mean Peter? Well he has solved alot of cases , even after many years...it's only a matter of time. That's why Joran has been severely reprimanded not to talk to anyone, period.
As IF you would know.
Of Peter's work, you can laugh all you want. What looks more sinister is the way his info was handled...first Mos made the comments his info can be used for trial, then Mos backs down. That has been the story from day 1 in the case. Why are they all backing down after getting all fired up to solve the case?
Laugh, I will.
Peter has NO credibility.
The "evidence" that he had was skeeterized and incomplete. It would never be allowed in the U.S. either.
What have I done to show concern for the truth? Notice I didn't ask you about truth.![]()
I have checked out a website that has done a research on truths as provided by "in the know" posters and on one particular subject there were many variances with the latest backing down to "I was told", not that "I know b/c I saw....".
Oh? What website would that be?
Are you a teacher btw? You tend to speak/write as if you are talking to students. Do you paint also?
So you are trying to insinuate that this poster is Anita?
Trying to "out" a poster?
That is against the board rules.
But, then again, when has that ever stopped you?
luvslalom wrote:
There were a number of things Gielen said as being true however what gets me riled most, and I will pick one...is the Natalee molested by her stepfather. Message board fodder and she has no proof of anything. There was a little group with a private space that concocted crap and then sent forth some posters with the misinfo and therein lies the proof of Gielens.
What about Petertje? You mean Peter? Well he has solved alot of cases , even after many years...it's only a matter of time. That's why Joran has been severely reprimanded not to talk to anyone, period.
Of Peter's work, you can laugh all you want. What looks more sinister is the way his info was handled...first Mos made the comments his info can be used for trial, then Mos backs down. That has been the story from day 1 in the case. Why are they all backing down after getting all fired up to solve the case? OM's and all concerned come on like tigers, and slink out like mice.
What have I done to show concern for the truth? Notice I didn't ask you about truth.![]()
I have checked out a website that has done a research on truths as provided by "in the know" posters and on one particular subject there were many variances with the latest backing down to "I was told", not that "I know b/c I saw....".
Are you a teacher btw? You tend to speak/write as if you are talking to students. Do you paint also?
Bongo wrote:
You are implying that Mrs. Gielen said 'a number of things as being true' including 'the Natalee molested by her stepfather'? Is that true? Did she state this particular example as a fact? Imo she did not.
WordsofWisdom wrote:
Let's be clear...
Ms. Gielen did not state that Jug molested Natalee.
She merely filmed the 2 psychics that said it.
The 2 psychics stated they had evidence of it.
I don't know if they do or don't.
But the point is Gielen simply documented their accusations via filming the press conference- she didn't make the accusations.
In contrast, Beth AND Jug did state that JK2 were criminals. Criminals that "kidnapped, raped, and murdered" Natalee. They did this daily, at press conferences and talk shows that had an INTERNATIONAL audience watching- with no evidence to support it.
None.
that's exactly the way I see it, and to be honest, the good English me manque quit a bit.luvslalom wrote:There were a number of things Gielen said as being true however what gets me riled most, and I will pick one...is the Natalee molested by her stepfather.
WordsofWisdom wrote:Gielen never stated that Natalee was molested by Jug. You are confused.
The 2 pyschics said it.
Return to Natalee Holloway Case Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest